Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Malik, Kanika
- Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Last Decade of Twentieth-Century (1996–1999) — I
Abstract Views :72 |
PDF Views:71
Authors
Kanika Malik
1,
Aqa Raza
2
Affiliations
1 CSIR–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi — 110 012, India., IN
2 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat — 131 001, Haryana, India., IN
1 CSIR–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi — 110 012, India., IN
2 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat — 131 001, Haryana, India., IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 28, No 1 (2023), Pagination: 68-78Abstract
This paper seeks to review the articles published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in the last decade of the twentieth century from Volume 1(1) (1996) to Volume 4(6) (1999). There are seven intellectual property (IP) statutes in force in India. When JIPR published its first Volume in the year 1996, only two IP statutes, legislated and enacted in post-independent India, were in force, namely: (i) The CopyrightAct, 1957; and (ii) The Patents Act, 1970 — enacted after 10 years and 23 years respectively after the independence of the country. Nevertheless, the Imperial Act on designs was also in force by the virtue of Article 372 of the Constitution of India, until the Indian Parliament enacted a separate statute on designs. Two statutes were enacted in 1999 and the other three statutes were enacted in the first decade of the 21 st century but some of them took a time of almost a decade to come into force. For convenience, the papers published in JIPR have been reviewed year-wise. Paper attempts to identify the: (i) total number of issues published; (ii) total number of articles published; (iii)total number of contributions made by the Indian and foreign scholars;(iv) total number of sole and joint publications; (v) publishing style of JIPR; and (vi) area of IP covered in the publications. JIPR since its inception has aimed to fill void in the IP literature in general and the Indian IP literature in particular. Paper develops an argument that JIPR has significantly contributed in the dissemination of IP information and knowledge, and also in creating IP knowledge and awareness by publishing quality research articles on an open access platform.Keywords
JIPR, IP Statutes, Scholars, CSIR-NIScPR, CSIR-NISCAIR, IP Awareness, Articles, Copyright, Patents, Trade Marks, Geographical Indications, Trade Secrets, Industrial Design, Design,Integrated Circuit, Plant Varieties, TRIPS, WIPO, GATT, Treaties, Agreement, Research, Development, Review, IP Publications, Publici Juris, Dissemination of Knowledge, Creation of New Knowledge, Twentieth-Century.References
- The Copyright Act, 1957 (Act 14 of 1957) and The Patents Act, 1970 (Act 39 of 1970).
- The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Act 47 of 1999) and The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 (Act 48 of 1999).
- The Designs Act, 2000 (Act 16 of 2000); The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000 (Act 37 of 2000) and The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001 (Act 53 of 2001).
- The National Law School of India Act, 1986 (Karnataka Act 22 of 1986). It was published on the Official Gazette on 29 August 1987, and the first batch of five-year integrated law programme commenced in 1988.
- The National Law School of India University, Bengaluru, https://www.nls.ac.in/about/about-nlsiu/ (accessed on 12 July 2022)
- The Banaras Hindu University Act, 1915 (Act 16 of 1915).
- The Aligarh Muslim UniversityAct, 1920 (Act 40 of 1920).
- The Delhi University Act, 1922 (Act 8 of 1922).
- Scopus Source Details, JIPR, https://www.scopus.com/ sourceid/19700173001 (accessed on 12 July 2022).
- ISSN, https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/0975-1076 (accessed on 13 July 2022).
- Online repository of JIPRhttp://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/ 123456789/45 (accessed on 12 July 2022).
- Nair M D, Intellectual Property Rights and the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 1(1) (1996) 1–9.
- The Patents Act, 1970 (Act 39 of 1970).
- Subbaram N R, Intellectual Property System in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 1(1) (1996) 10–15.
- Gupta R K and Subbaram N R, International Conventions, Agreements & Treaties for the Protection of Intellectual Property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights1(2) (1996) 67–75.
- Gupta V K, Protection of Computer Software/Algorithm, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights1(2) (1996) 76–86.
- Subbaram N R, GATT Final Act: Patenting of Inventions Present and Future Position, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 1(2) (1996) 87–90.
- Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2022).
- The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gatt47.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2022).
- Kardam K S, Patentable Inventions in Biotechnology, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 1(3) (1996) 133–138.
- Schoolman H M, Intellectual Property Rights and the National Information Infrastructure*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 1(3) (1996) 139–147.
- Bijlani S K, Commercial Uses of Patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 1(4) (1996) 199–205.
- Ram B, Intellectual Property Rights and Technology Development: Some Suggestions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 1(5) (1996) 249–253.
- Mallick S and Rajagopal N R, Patent Literacy Mission of HRDG, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 1(5) (1996) 254–256.
- Martin B, Against Intellectual property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 1(5) (1996) 257–270.
- Majumdar S, The Copyright Eclipses, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 1(6) (1996) 307–315.
- Roy B N and Veera S,Process Patent Act & Export of Drugs and Pharmaceuticals, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(1) (1997) 1–9.
- Keayla B K, TRIPS Agreement on New Patent Regime: An Extreme Compromise,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(1) (1997) 10–13.
- VinklerP,Patent Indicators Characterizing Information Flow Between Countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(2) (1997) 49–59.
- Gupta V K, WIPO Draft Databases Treaty: Issues and Implications in Indian Context, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(2) (1997) 60–70.
- Kardam KS, Patenting Activities in India: An Overview, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(3) (1997) 113–123.
- The Patents and Designs Act, 1911 (Act 2 of 1911).
- Roy B N, Patent Infringement Issues, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(3) (1997) 124–130.
- Munasinghe K, Searching the Patent Pipeline,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(4) (1997) 177–180.
- Gupta V K, Intellectual Property Rights in Commercialization of R&D and Transfer of Technology, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(4) (1997) 181–190.
- Ustinova E A and Chelisheva O V, Are Markush Structures Matters of Chemistry and Law or Just Figments of the Imagination?*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(5) (1997) 227–240.
- Patenting Activity in Asian Region during Late Eighties, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(6) (1997) 275–285.
- U.S. Chemical Patents Issued during 1984-94*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2(6) (1997) 286–289.
- Sahai S, India’s Position on Intellectual Property Rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(1) (1998) 1–8.
- Krishnan A S A and Chakravarti A K, Intellectual Property Rights in the Ensuing Global Digital Economy*,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(1) (1998) 9–20.
- Public Perception of Intellectual Property Rights*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(1) (1998) 21–22.
- Reddy K A, Role of Intellectual Property Rights in the Technological Upgradation*,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(1) (1998) 23–24.
- Roy B N, Novelty and Obviousness in Patent Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(2) (1998) 59–67.
- Leesti M, Historical Background, General Provisions and Basic Principles of the TRIPS Agreement and Transitional Arrangements*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(2) (1998) 68–73.
- Ganesan A V, Role of Intellectual Property Rights in the Technological Upgradation*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(2) (1998) 74–81.
- Anand P, State of IndianIntellectual Property*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(2) (1998) 82–85.
- Debroy B, Intellectual Property Protection in India*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(2) (1998) 86–89.
- Gupta V K, Basmati Rice Lines and Grains - Gist of the US Patent No 5,663,484, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(3) (1998) 127–137.
- Geuze M, Mechanisms in the WTO Framework Aimed at Ensuring Compliance with Obligations under the TRIPS Agreement*Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(3) (1998) 138–148.
- Clemente C L, State of IP in Pharmaceutical Industry* Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(3) (1998) 161–164.
- Govindarajulu V, Developing Intellectual Property Laws by Hindsight*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(4) (1998) 205–221.
- Chandran S and Govindarajulu V, Does Biotechnology Need a New Database Treaty*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(4) (1998) 222–231.
- Kandan D V L, Patents, Industrial Designs and Layout-Designs (Topographies) of Integrated Circuits*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(4) (1998) 232–236.
- Kandan D V L, Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Protection of Undisclosed Information*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(4) (1998) 237–242.
- Gupta V K, WTO and IPR: Implications for R&D Management* Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(5) (1998) 271–280.
- Leesti M, Patents, Industrial Designs and Layout-Designs (Topographies) of Integrated Circuits*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(5) (1998) 281–286.
- Kutty P V V G, Copyright and Neighbouring Rights-Management and Protection*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(5) (1998) 287–294.
- Tiwari S, Copyright and Related Rights*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(5) (1998) 295–298.
- Kumar R, TRIPS: Protection ofGeographical Denominations and Undisclosed Information*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(5) (1998) 299–308.
- Tiwari R, Trends in Patent Renewals in India,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(6) (1998) 337–341.
- Tondon S, Copyright and Related Rights *, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(6) (1998) 342–346.
- Krishnaswamy M, The BasmatiPatent — A Blessing in Disquise?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(6) (1998) 347–351.
- Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 3(6) (1998) 352–355.
- Chandran S S, IntellectualProperty Rights in Medical Biotechnology, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(1) (1999) 1–7.
- Kumar N, Life Form Patenting: A Case for Setting up International Depositary Authorities in India*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(1) (1999) 8–15.
- Gupta N K, Overview of the Indian Industrial Design Law and Practice, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(1) (1999) 16–21.
- Singh R D, Intellectual Property Rights in Relation to Plant Genetic Resources, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(2) (1999) 63–66.
- Garg K C, Patenting Activity in Biosensors, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(2) (1999) 67–79.
- Geuze M, Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights and Dispute Settlement under the TRIPS Agreement*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(2) (1999) 80–88.
- Bartels B, PCT and Its Importance to India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(3) (1999) 127–139.
- Tripathi R C and Chakravarti R K, IPR and Software Related Crime Prevention, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(3) (1999) 140–150.
- Leesti M, Modernization of Intellectual Property Legislation and Administration in the Context of the TRIPS Agreement*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(3) (1999) 151–158.
- Subbaram N R, Gearing up for the Management of IPR in the 21st Century, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(4) (1999) 191–198.
- Pillai CKS, Value-Added Materials from Cashewnut Shell Liquid: A Study on Their Recent Patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(4) (1999) 199–206.
- Kardam K S, Decisions on Patentability and Novelty Criteria*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(4) (1999) 207–214.
- Tiwari S, Implications for Developing Countries of Obligations on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights as Prescribed by the TRIPS Agreement*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(4) (1999) 215–218.
- Sudarshan B, Access to Patent Information, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(4) (1999) 219–224.
- Mashelkar R A, The Role of WIPONET in the Development and Transfer of Technology and its Contribution to the Modernization of Intellectual Property Services*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(5) (1999) 257–264.
- Chandran S S, Avoiding the Fall after TRIPS, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(5) (1999) 265–273.
- Pillai C K S, Liquid Crystalline Polymers: A Review of Their Patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(5) (1999) 274–285.
- Kulshreshtha A K and Awasthi S K, Patent Literature on Catalysts for Olefin Polymerization: [I] Ziegler-Natta Catalysts, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(5) (1999) 286–292.
- Tiwari S, Modernization of Intellectual Property Legislation and Administration in the Context of TRIPS, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(5) (1999) 293–295.
- Gupta V K and Pangannaya N S, IPR Information: Analysis and Drafting of Patent Claims for R&D Scientists, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(6) (1999) 325–338.
- Krishnaswamy M, How to Protect ‘Ancient’ IPR, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(6) (1999) 339–342.
- Narayanaswamy K, Patent Regime on Plant Varieties, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(6) (1999) 343–346.
- Leesti M, Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights and Dispute Settlement under the TRIPS Agreement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 4(6) (1999) 347–350.
- Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the First Decade of Twenty-First Century (2000–2004) — II
Abstract Views :70 |
PDF Views:73
Authors
Kanika Malik
1,
Aqa Raza
2
Affiliations
1 CSIR–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research(CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi, 110 012, India., IN
2 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, 131 001, Haryana, India., IN
1 CSIR–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research(CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi, 110 012, India., IN
2 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, 131 001, Haryana, India., IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 28, No 2 (2023), Pagination: 171-185Abstract
This Paper seeks to review the articles published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in the first half of the first decade of the twenty-first century from Volume 5 (1) (2000) to Volume 9 (6) (2004). During this period, a total of seven post-independent IP legislations were enacted in the country. This Paper reviews the articles published in JIPR year-wise. Paper attempts to identify: (i) total number of issues published; (ii) total number of articles published; (iii) total number of contributions made by the Indian and foreign scholars; (iv) total number of sole and joint publications; (v) publishing style of JIPR; and (vi) area of IP covered in each volume. Dissemination of information is a necessary condition for creation of new knowledge. JIPR through an open-access platform has provided an opportunity to the IP scholars to publish their writings addressing the gaps in the areas ofIP. In the end, Paper develops an argument that JIPR has significantly contributed in the development of IP by disseminating IP information and knowledge and also in creating IP knowledge and awareness.Keywords
JIPR, IP Statutes, CSIR-NIScPR, CSIR-NISCAIR, IP Awareness, Articles, Copyright, Patents, Trade Marks, Geographical Indications, Trade Secrets, Industrial Design, Design, Integrated Circuit,Plant Varieties, TRIPS, WIPO, GATT, Treaties, Agreement, TKDL, Research, Development, Review, IP Publications, Publici Juris, Dissemination of Knowledge, Creation of New Knowledge, First Decade, 21 st Century.References
- Malik K and Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights(JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Last Decade of Twentieth-Century (1996–1999) — I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 68–78.
- Kulshreshtha A K and Awasthi S K, Patent literature on catalysts for olefin polymerization: [II] Metallocenes, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (1) (2000) 1–12.
- Gupta N K, Information for filing international applications for patent under Patent Cooperation Treaty by Indian applicants, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (1) (2000) 13–17.
- Pahamin D A, The protection and management of intellectual property in a digital environment, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (1) (2000) 18–25.
- Gupta V K, Negotiating IPR during international cooperation in science and technology, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (2) (2000) 61–71.
- Raina R K, Project and patent planning, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (2) (2000) 72–75.
- Babu G V S & Arora S, Biodiversity and IPR, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (2) (2000) 76–79.
- Vasudeva P K, India and other Asian countries losing on biodiversity, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (2) (2000) 80–86.
- Alikhan S, Intellectual property as a tool for development in the knowledge - based economy * , Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (3) (2000) 115–124.
- Gupta N K, Exclusive marketing rights – Background and their implications, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (3) (2000) 125–131.
- Act 17 of 1999.
- Tiwari R, Interpreting claims in a patent specification, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5(3) (2000) 132–136.
- Craze D, Protection ofwell-known marks, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (3) (2000) 137–151.
- Bheemeswar D, intellectual property asset management — A tool for total quality management, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (4) (2000) 183–188.
- Vasudeva P K, Patents for cloning embryos, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (4) (2000) 189–196.
- Ghosh S K, Biodiversity and IPR- ethics and politics, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (4) (2000) 197–205.
- Karki M M S & Gupta V K, Natural product innovations: Taxol, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (4) (2000) 206–210.
- Gupta V K, Employerv Employee inventions: IPR issues in R&D organizations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (5) (2000) 239–250.
- Keayla B K, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Bill, 1999: Some critical issues, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (5) (2000) 251–255.
- Karki M M S, IPR issues associated with internet domain names, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5(5) (2000) 256–261.
- Olsson H, Electronic commerce and intellectual property developments in Europe’ Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (5) (2000) 256–266.
- Tiwari S, The WIPO Internet Treaties, Facing the challenges of the digital economy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (5) (2000) 267–270.
- Gupta V K, An approach for establishing a Traditional Knowledge Digital Library, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5 (6) (2000) 307–319.
- Karki P, An introduction to business method patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5(6) (2000) 320–326.
- Karki M M S, Technology trends in biosensors as reflected by patent analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 5(6) (2000) 327–332.
- Karki M M S, IPR issues in biotechnology in the context of developing countries and India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6(1) (2001) 1–17.
- Benoît M, Copyright on the Internet * , Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6(1) (2001) 18–26.
- Karki M M S, Neem-based natural product innovations: Analysis of patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6(1) (2001) 27–37.
- Alikhan S, Intellectual property management for enhancing competitiveness particularly in Small and Medium Enterprises * , Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (2) (2001) 85–26.
- Gopakumar K M, The scope of reverse engineering of computer software under the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999: A Critique, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (2) (2001) 94–108.
- Ghosh S K,VirupakshappaK, Singh M S & Sadananda A R, IPR and seed industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (2) (2001) 109–120.
- Gupta V K, Report of the Task Force on Traditional Knowledge Digital Library: A gist, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (2) (2001) 121–133.
- Garg K C, Inventing and patenting on lasers – An overview, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (2) (2001) 134–137.
- Vellakkat R, Servitudes of intangible properties, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (3) (2001) 181–188.
- Keayla B K,Patent System: Implications for health care and pharma industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (3) (2001) 189–199.
- Price S & Renk B Z, Intellectual property transfer mechanisms at universities * , Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (3) (2001) 200–210.
- Maran M,Intellectual property: Policy and strategy for 21st century, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (3) (2001) 111–114.
- Dutt B,Tamarind - based Innovations: Analysis of patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (3) (2001) 115–126.
- Mashelkar R A, Role of IPR in economics of knowledge, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (4) (2001) 271–276.
- Gupta V K, Managing software protection, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (4) (2001) 277–285.
- Krishna G A & Prakash V, Functional foods — The IPR angle, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (4) (2001) 286–291.
- Banerjee P, A possible Indianresponse to software and business method patenting, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (4) (2001) 292–300.
- Vasudeva P K, Implicationsof WTO on agriculture, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (4) (2001) 301–311.
- Adcock M & Llewelyn M, Legal protection of biological material: Globalisationv Statefreedom, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (5) (2001) 361–368.
- Mashelkar R A, Intellectual property management in India: New challenges and opportunities ahead * , Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (5) (2001) 369–376.
- Ghosh S K, Sarkar C Kr G & Datta S, Molecular Markers for Cultivar Identification and PBR, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (5) (2001) 377–388.
- Gupta V K, B2B E-commerce: Technological, Legal and IPR Issues * , Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (5) (2001) 389–397.
- Gupta V K, Legislation affecting science and technology — Need for more public debate*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (5) (2001) 398–403.
- Prajneshu M & Gupta V K, Traditional knowledge database: IPR and opportunities for R&D, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (6) (2001) 449–458.
- Ragavan S, Patent Amendments in India in the Wake of TRIPS * , Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (6) (2001) 459–471.
- Ghate U, Fighting patent wars on bioresources: The Indian response, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (6) (2001) 472–478.
- Haycock P, Patents in the life sciences*, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (6) (2001) 479–486.
- Gardener W and Rosenbaum J,Databases protection and access to information, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 6 (6) (2001) 487–492.
- Correa C M, Intellectual property right under WTO and Animal genetic resources, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (1) (2002) 7–23.
- Prajneshu M & Gupta V K, Patenting on Clove, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7(1) (2002) 24–32.
- Mysore S, Adoption and implementation of intellectual property rights: Experiences of selected countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (1) (2002) 33–45.
- Lall A R & Khurana V, Brand valuation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (1) (2002) 46–49.
- Altbach P G, The subtle inequalities of copyright†, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (1) (2002) 50–57.
- Nair M D, Harmonization of Patent Laws—Still a dream? † , Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (1) (2002) 58–61.
- Blackman M J R, Patent Information: A New Dynamic for South-East Asia?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (2) (2002) 105–118.
- Dhar R, New dimensions topatents on Genomics and Proteomics, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (2) (2002) 119–127.
- Tripathi R C, Garg A K, Taneja V B & Chakravarti A K, Patenting of computer software: Status and approach, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (2) (2002) 128–142.
- Ahmad U, Intellectual property rights and assessment of the raw materials (Crude Drugs) Used in Indian systems of medicine, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (2) (2002) 143–150.
- Ho M W, Why Biotech patents are patently absurd— Scientific briefing on TRIPS and related issues, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (2) (2002) 151–165.
- Chu S T, How will patents on business methods affect e-commerce?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (2) (2002) 166–179.
- Sekar S & Kandavel D, Patenting microorganisms: Towards creating a Policy Framework, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (3) (2002) 211–221.
- Arunachalam V, Indigenous knowledge and intellectual property rights: The latent logistics and the overt concerns, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (3) (2002) 222–232.
- Wendt J & Izquierdo J, Biotechnology and development: A balance between IPR protection and benefit-sharing,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (3) (2002) 233–240.
- Nair M D, TRIPS and public health: The Doha Declaration, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (3) (2002) 241–244.
- King K, The value of intellectual property, intangible assets and goodwill,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (3) (2002) 245–248.
- Koshy J, Jose R, John A M,Thomas J K, Kumar S S & Damodaran A D, High temperature superconductivity: Challenges in IPR Regime and Strategies for national initiatives, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (4) (2002) 295–307.
- Mashelkar R A, Intellectual property rights and the third world, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (4) (2002) 308–323.
- Swaminathan M S, The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act: From legislation to implementation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (4) (2002) 324–329.
- Dutt B, A study of patenting activity in Aloe vera, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (4) (2002) 330–341.
- Nair M D, TRIPS and parallel imports — Impact on drug prices, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (4) (2002) 342–345.
- Amaradasa R M W, Silva M A T De & Pathirage R P, Patents in a small developing economy: A case study of Sri Lanka, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (5) (2002) 395–404.
- Nair M D, An industry in transition: The Indian pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (5) (2002) 405–415.
- Prajneshu M & Gupta V K, Intellectual property rights in sugarcane research, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (5) (2002) 416–422.
- James T C, Indian Copyright Law and digital technologies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (5) (2002) 423–435.
- Starein W, A tool to enhance competitiveness of SMEs, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (5) (2002) 436–439.
- Alikhan S, The role of copyright in the cultural and economic development ofdeveloping countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (6) (2002) 489–505.
- Chandrashekaran S & Vasudev S,The Indian Plant Variety Protection Act beneficiaries: The Indian farmer or the Corporate Seed Company?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (6) (2002) 506–515.
- Suman Y & Gupta V K, Patenting issues in software industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (6) (2002) 516–525.
- Nair M D, Protection of trade secrets/undisclosed information, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (6) (2002) 526–529.
- Sahni M, Patenting in Saffron, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 7 (6) (2002) 530–535.
- Gahukar R T, Issues relating to the patentability of biotechnological subject matter in Indian agriculture, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (1) (2003) 9–22.
- Saha T K, Copyright Law in the changing world, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (1) (2003) 23–31.
- Madhavan M,Use of copyright by open source software movement on computer software and its implications, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (1) (2003) 32–49.
- Ranjan R, PCT System and its impact on the developing countries,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (1) (2003) 50–57.
- Mitra Y, Copyright protection of indirect copying of computer programs: Suggestions for Indian Courts, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (2) (2003) 103–111.
- Rao M K D & Gupta V K, IPR and Sharing of biological research materials in R&D, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (2) (2003) 112–122.
- Raina R K, Commercial transfer agreements of new plant varieties and materials thereof, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (2) (2003) 123–129.
- Chow M & Fernandez D, Intellectual property strategy in bioinformatics, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (2) (2003) 130–137.
- Farooq A, Liability limits of service providers for copyright infringement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (3) (2003) 181–190.
- Bandopadhyay S, Justifying the ‘Back-Step’: Establishing the foothold of reverse engineering within the indigenous ethical parameters of software copyright, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (3) (2003) 191–204.
- Guruprasad K, Kanagavel P, Srikanth K, Radhika K & Sonal S, Analysis of US patents granted to Indian inventors, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (3) (2003) 205–212.
- Livingston J D, India needs an Idea Bank to lead the world in intellectual property protection, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (3) (2003) 213–221.
- James T C, Copyright issues in e-publishing, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (4) (2003) 269–275.
- Thomas Z,Digital technologies and emerging copyright scenario, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (4) (2003) 276–301.
- Lohray B B, Banerjee K & Panikar A, Contributory patent infringement and the pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (4) (2003) 302–311.
- Rajan M T S, Moral rights indeveloping countries: The example of India – Part I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (5) (2003) 357–374.
- Bhattacharjee S, Ambush marketing -The problem and the projected solutions vis-a-visIntellectual Property Law - A global perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (5) (2003) 375–388.
- Chaudhuri S K, Microbial biopiracy in India: How to fight back?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (5) (2003) 389–399.
- Oh C, IPRs and biological resources: Implications for developing countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (5) (2003) 400–413.
- Rajan M T S,Moral rights in developing countries: The example of India—Part II, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (6) (2003) 449–461.
- Madhukar A and Pal S K, Analysisof patents pertaining to arsenic removal from contaminated water bodies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (6) (2003) 462–467.
- Tripathi S K, Intellectual property and genetic resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore: International, regional and national perspectives, trends and strategies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (6) (2003) 468–477.
- Ganguli P, Creating and embedding an Intellectual Property Rights Policy in an educational or publicly-funded research and development institution, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 8 (6) (2003) 478–485.
- Srivastava S C, Geographical Indications under TRIPS Agreement and Legal Framework in India: Part I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (1) (2004) 9–23.
- Ganguly P, Intellectual property systems in scientifically capable developing countries: Emerging options, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (1) (2004) 24–33.
- Gupta V K, Multi-disciplinary Studies on IPR in R&D: A Review, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (1) (2004) 34–42.
- Kumar H, Border areas for the protection of intellectual property rights: An analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (1) (2004) 43–50.
- Srivastava, S C, Geographical Indications under TRIPS Agreement and Legal Framework in India: Part II, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (2) (2004) 105–119.
- Kumari T V, Celebrity rights as a form of merchandise – Protection under the Intellectual Property Regime, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (2) (2004) 120–135.
- Mukherjee S, Passing Off in internet domain names—A legal analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (2) (2004) 136–147.
- Biswas, S K De, Copyrightability of characters, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (2) (2004) 148–156.
- James T C, Copyright Law of India and the academic community, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (3) (2004) 207–225.
- Raju K D, WTO-TRIPS obligations and patent amendments in India: A critical stocktaking, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (3) (2004) 226–241.
- Rao N H & Sastry R K, Towards a Policy for management of intellectual property in public agricultural research systems in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (3) (2004) 242–259.
- Mukherjee S & Bhattacharjee S, Technology transfer and the intellectual property issues emerging from IT – An analysis from a developing country perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (3) (2004) 260–274.
- Ghatak P, Tripathi R C & Chakravarti A K, Digital Rights Management: An integrated secure digital content distribution technology, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (4) (2004) 13–31.
- Chakravarthy K & Pendsey N, Research exemptions in Patent Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (4) (2004) 332–341.
- Kochhar S, System perspective for IPR protection in The Plant Kingdom, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (4) (2004) 342–355.
- Pandey S, Neighbouring rights protection in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (4) (2004) 356–370.
- Nair M D, Compulsory licences imbroglio: Provisions under TRIPS and their interpretations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (5) (2004) 415–423.
- Ghosh S, Domain name disputes and evaluation of the ICANN’s Uniform Domain NameDispute Resolution Policy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (5) (2004) 424–439.
- Mittal R, P2P networks: Online piracy of music, films and computer software, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (5) (2004) 440–461.
- Ravindran S R, Capacity building for innovation: Role of IP infrastructure, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (5) (2004) 462–470.
- Kumar J, Biotechnology patenting, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (5) (2004) 471–480.
- Mathew M, Hegde M & Garge G,Intellectual property in software: Insights for Indian business, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (6) (2004) 515–532.
- Ravi S B, Effectiveness of Indian Sui GenerisLaw on plant variety protection and its potential to attract private investment in crop improvement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (6) (2004) 533–548.
- Nagarsheth A, Experimental use exception: An international and comparative overview with a possible answer to the forthcoming Indian Patent Legislation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (6) (2004) 549–556.
- Dalal P, The long arm jurisdiction of courts regarding Copyright Law in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (6) (2004) 557–567.
- Verbauwhede L, Intellectual property and e-commerce: How to take care of a company’s website?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 9 (6) (2004) 568–58.
- Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the First Decade of Twenty-First Century (2005–2009) — III
Abstract Views :82 |
PDF Views:76
Authors
Aqa Raza
1,
Kanika Malik
2
Affiliations
1 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat- 131 001, Haryana, India., IN
2 CSIR–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research(CSIR-NIScPR), New Delhi- 110012, India., IN
1 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat- 131 001, Haryana, India., IN
2 CSIR–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research(CSIR-NIScPR), New Delhi- 110012, India., IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 28, No 3 (2023), Pagination: 242-266Abstract
This Paper seeks to review the articles published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in the second half of the first decade of the twenty-first century from Volume 10 (1) (2005) to Volume 14 (6) (2009). During this period, a total of seven post-independent enacted IP legislations were in force in the country. This Paper seeks to review the articles published in JIPR year-wise during the decade. Paper attempts to identify: (i) total number of issues published; (ii) total number of articles published; (iii) total number of contributions made by the Indian and foreign scholars; (iv) total number of sole and joint publications; (v) publishing style of JIPR; and (vi) areas of IP covered in each volume. A review ofarticles published during this period reveals that on an average, a total of 44 articles have been published in each volume. In the total articles published between 1996–2009, the articles published during the second half of the first decade of 21 st century constitutes 52 percent (220 articles) compared to 31.20 percent published between 2000–2004 (132 articles)and 16.78 percent between 1996–1999 (71 papers). JIPR through an open-access platform has provided an opportunity tothe IP scholars to publish their writings addressing the gaps in the areas of IP. In the end, Paper develops an argument that JIPR has significantly contributed in the development of IP by disseminating IP information and knowledge, and also in creating IP knowledge and awareness.Keywords
JIPR, IP statutes, Scholars, CSIR-NIScPR, CSIR-NISCAIR, IP Awareness, Articles, Copyright, Patents, Trade Marks, Geographical Indications, Trade Secrets, Industrial Design, Design, Integrated Circuit, Plant Varieties, TRIPS, WIPO, GATT, IPRs, Treaties, Agreement, Research, Case Law Development, Amendments, Review, IP Publications, Publici Juris, Dissemination of Knowledge, Creation of New Knowledge, First Decade, Twenty-first Century.References
- Malik K &Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights(JIPR) in IPR research: A View through the Articles Published in the Last Decade of Twentieth-Century (1996–1999) — I,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 68–78.
- Malik K & Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights(JIPR) in IPR research: A View through the Articles Published in the First Decade of Twenty-First Century (2000–2004) — II,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 171–185.
- Krishnan A, Testing for copyright protection and infringement in Non-Literal, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (1) (2005) 9–20.
- Singh D V & Kumar P, Photocopying of copyrighted works for educational purposes: Does it constitute Fair Use?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (1) (2005) 21–33.
- Burrone E, Intellectual property rights and innovation in SMEs in OECD countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (1) (2005) 34–43.
- Chawla H S, Patenting ofbiological material and biotechnology, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (1) (2005) 45–51.
- Ninan S, Sharma A &Ananthan P S, Intellectual property rights in Fisheries Sector,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (1) (2005) 52–58.
- Karki M M S, Personal data privacy and intellectual property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (1) (2005) 59– 63.The word “Property” is missing from the title of the paper as mentioned on JIPRwebpage but is mentioned in the article.
- Pal S K, Madhukar A & Mitra A, Patenting in micromagnetic sensors, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (2) (2005) 99–105.
- Tulzapurkar V, Remix and Copyright Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (2) (2005) 106–111.
- New York Times Co v Tasini59 USPQ2D 1001/533 US 433 (2001).
- Kumar H, Employer’s Copyright vis-à-visauthor’s right: An unresolved legal dilemma, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (2) (2005) 112–118.
- Bhattacharjee S & Rao G, The broadening horizons of Trademark Law -Registrability ofsmell, sports merchandise and building designs as trademarks, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (2) (2005) 119–126.
- Torremans P L C, Trademark Law: Is Europe moving towards an unduly wide approach for anyone to follow the example?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (2) (2005) 127–132.
- Geller P E, International intellectual property, conflicts of laws, and internet remedies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (2) (2005) 133–140.
- Baechtold P & Miyamoto T, International Patent Law Harmonization—A search for the right balance, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (3) (2005) 177–187.
- Ganley P, The Internet, creativity and copyright incentives, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (3) (2005) 188–197.
- Shin J & Park Y, Generation and application of Patent Claim Map: Text mining and (Network Analysis), Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (3) (2005) 198–205. The word “Property” is missing from the title of the paper as mentioned on the JIPR webpage but is mentioned in the article.
- Aoki R, Intellectual Property and Consortium Standard Patent Pools, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (3) (2005) 206–213.
- Mehlwal G,Intellectual property licensing: Discovering its facets, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (3) (2005) 214–220.
- Phadnis R & Hirwani R R, Patent analysis as a tool for research planning: Case study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10(3) (2005) 221–231.
- Raj R S P, Inventive step or non-obviousness of an invention, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (3) (2005) 232–234.
- Pillai M, The Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 and TRIPS compliance–A critique, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (3) (2005) 235–238.
- Chandran S, Roy A and Jain L,Implications of New Patent Regime on Indian Pharmaceutical industry: Challenges and opportunities, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (4) (2005) 269–280.
- Mendonca S, Large innovating firms and patent management: Challenges for SMEs’ Managers and IP Officials in catching-up economies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (4) (2005) 281–286.
- Zekos G I G, Discrepancies in biotechnology/chemical patenting, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (4) (2005) 287–299.
- Narasani A K & Kankanala K C, Testing parameters for software patentability, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (4) (2005) 300–307.
- Dwivedi A & Saroha M, Copyright Laws as a means of extending protection to expressions of folklore, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (4) (2005) 308–314.
- Mittal R and Singh G, Patenting activities in agriculture from India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (4) (2005) 315–320.
- Gandhi G, IPR and India – A viewpoint, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 359–360.
- Swenson S W, Role of collaborations, systems, and the soul in IP and innovation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 361–368.
- Saha R, Capacity building inmanagement of intellectual property rights- A case of publicly funded institutions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 369–375.
- Wang B, Intellectual property management and value-added strategy of the Industrial Technology Research Institute, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 376–381.
- Represa-Sánchez D, Encouraging protection of public research results in Spain, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 382–388.
- Goddar H, Making Industry-University interactions work - Model agreements in Germany , Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 389–393.
- Tansinsin L G, Transfer of technology with intellectual property rights (IPR)—The Philippine experience, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 394–398.
- Hyndman K G, Gruskin S M & Iyer C S, Technology transfer: What India can learn from the United States, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 399–405.
- Gupta R K, Valorization of intellectual property from Publicly Funded Organizations: A case study of the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 406–412.
- Bhattacharya P, Technology transfer from a Technical University: A case study of IIT Delhi, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 413–416.
- Bhuvaneshwar G S and Ranjit D, Medical device development – A novel experience in patenting and technology transfer, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 417–420.
- Peters R, Technology licensing: A win-win solution in the intellectual economy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 421–425.
- Bawa R, Bawa S R & Maebius S B, The Nanotechnology Patent ‘Gold Rush’ , Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 426–433.
- Kumar P R & Prakash V, Value addition to agricultural resources – The IPR angle, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 434–440.
- Pushpangadan P, Value addition and commercialization of biodiversity and associated traditional knowledge in the context of the Intellectual Property Regime, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (5) (2005) 441–453.
- Laik K, Role of intellectual property in economic growth, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (6) (2005) 465–473.
- Gupta A, Integrated circuits and intellectual property rights in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (6) (2005) 474–479.
- Tiwari A, Passing off and the Law on ‘Trade Dress’ protection: Reflections on Colgatev Anchor, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (6) (2005) 480–490.
- 2003 (27) PTC 428 (Del).
- Gupta S, Digital alteration of photographs and intellectual property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (6) (2005) 491–498.
- Karki M M S, Nontraditional areas of intellectual property protection: Colour, sound, taste, smell, shape, slogan and trade dress, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10 (6) (2005) 499–506.
- Cullet P, Human rights, knowledgeand intellectual property protection, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (1) (2006) 7–14
- Boswoth D, Conceptual issues of global counterfeiting on products and services, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (1) (2006) 15–21.
- Verma S K, Financing of intellectual property: Developing countries’ context, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (1) (2006) 22–32.
- Tiwari A & Ranjan S S, Proprietary rights or common property? — The dilemmas of copyright protection of Case-Law reporters, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (1) (2006) 33–42.
- Singhania A, Copyright Laws in India and maintenance of a welfare state, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (1) (2006) 43–52.
- Pillai M, Kumar S, Kumar R & Agarwal P, India’s Tryst with TRIPS continues!Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (1) (2006) 53–56.
- Saha T K & Bharti N, Beyond wines and spirits: Developing countries’ GI Products and their potential in WTO Regime with special reference to India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (2) (2006) 89–97.
- Kumar J, Intellectual property securitization: How far possible and effective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (2) (2006) 98–102.
- Gibson J, Patenting lives—Life patents, culture and development, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (2) (2006) 103–112.
- Basheer S, Taming of the Flu: Working through the Tamiflu patents in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (2) (2006) 113–124.
- Dalal P, Data Protection Law in India: The TRIPS perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (2) (2006) 125–131.
- Rana R, Indigenous culture and intellectual property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (2) (2006) 132–139.
- Maggon H, Legal Protection ofDatabases: An Indian Perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (2) (2006) 140–144.
- Ghosh A, Business Method Patents: The road ahead, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (3) (2006) 175–184.
- Nair L, The Melton Mowbray Pork Pie Case: Lessons for India?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (3) (2006) 185–191.
- Roy A G, Protection of intellectual property in the form of trade secrets, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (3) (2006) 192–200.
- Sahay S, Piracy of trade dress and the Law of Passing off: National and international perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (3) (2006) 201–206.
- Soam S K & Rashmi H B, Some reflections on Patent Search: A case study of medicinal plants of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (3) (2006) 207–213.
- Moerman L, Accounting for intellectual property: Inconsistencies and challenges, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (4) (2006) 243–248.
- Mangàni A, An economic analysisof rise of service marks, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (4) (2006) 249– 259.
- Hu R, Huang J, Pray C and Huang J, The determinants of Plant Variety Protection Applications in China, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (4) (2006) 260–268.
- Puttitanum T, Intellectual property rights and multinational firms’ modes of entry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (4) (2006) 269–273.
- Banerjee S, Transborder reputation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (4) (2006) 274–279.
- Thomas Z, IP Case Law Studies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (4) (2006) 280–284.
- Majumdar A, Sadhu S and Majumdar S, The requirement of graphical representability for non-conventional trademarks, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (5) (2006) 313– 317.
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayerv Grokster Ltd 125 S Ct 2764 (2005).
- Jha S andJha S, An analysis of the Theory of Contributory Infringement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (5) (2006) 318–325.
- Kumar R & Ramesh R, IPR, plagiarism and the text data security pyramid, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (5) (2006) 326–329.
- Jain K and Sharma V, Intellectual Property Management System: An organizational perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (5) (2006) 330–333.
- Basheer S, Block me not: How “essential” are patented genes, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (5) (2006) 334–358.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (5) (2006) 359–363.
- Pitchfork E, The protection of confidential information, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (5) (2006) 364– 367.
- Kumar A, Mohanty P & Nandakumar R, Legal protection of trade secrets: Towards a codified regime, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (6) (2006) 397–408.
- Shukla U, Comparative advertising and product disparagement vis-à-visTrademark Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (6) (2006) 409–414.
- Pareek A & Majumdar A, Protection of celebrity rights – The problems and the solutions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (6) (2006) 415–424.
- Lawrence H, Bootlegging – Its impact on sound recording industry and legal responses, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (6) (2006) 424–429.
- Chaudhuri S K & Dutta C, Impacts of a patent on Euryale ferox on biodiversity at micro level: A case study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (6) (2006) 430–435.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 11 (6) (2006) 436–442.
- Kardam K S, Patenting in the emerging fields of technology, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 15–29.
- Whittaker P, Human embryonic stem cell patents: A European perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 30–37.
- Gibson J, The discovery of invention: Gene patents and the question of patentability, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 38–44.
- Lakshmikumaran M, Patenting of genetic inventions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 45–56.
- Singh A, Das S and WilsonN, Genomics and IP: An overview, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 57–71.
- Harmon S H E, Biotech innovation and patenting in the developing world: China – A giant among nations?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 72–85.
- Boettiger S & Bennett A, PIPRA: A resource for collaborative intellectualproperty management in agriculture, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 86–91.
- Kowalski S, rational risk/benefit analysis of genetically modified crops, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 92–103.
- Kankanala K C, Diagnostic method patent model patent incentives and socio-ethical concerns, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 104–110.
- Shand H & Wetter K J, Trends in intellectual property and nanotechnology: Implications, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 111–117.
- Hennessey W O, What’s new? Innovating the teaching of Innovation Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 118–128.
- Field T G Jr, Patent systems: More easily faulted than fixed, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 129–141.
- Cannady C & Vega M I, R&D networks and intellectual property hubs: A strategy for developing countries to participate in knowledge led growth, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 142–153.
- Kochupillai M & Smith M A, Patent valuation with consideration for emerging technologies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 154–164.
- Unni V K, What is in a name: Viewing patent infringement through the prism of Anglo-American Doctrines, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12(1) (2007) 165–175.
- Ghosh R A, IPR, Law and FLOSS: Building a protected common, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 176–182.
- Rines R H, Should India and Other countries adopt the American ‘Business Methods’ class of patents?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (1) (2007) 183–184.
- Raju K D, Is the future of software development in open source,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (2) (2007) 199–211.
- Lukose L P, Rationale and prospects of the protection of Geographical Indication: An inquiry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (2) (2007) 212–223.
- Jain S and Tripathy S, Intellectual property and Competition Laws: Jural correlatives, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12(2) (2007) 224–235.
- Kahandawaarachchi T, A study of Indian and US Trademark Law relating to the effect of ‘Non-Use’ of a trademark, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (2) (2007) 236– 243.
- Laik K & Raj R, Changing dynamics of the Patent Regime: An economic understanding, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (2) (2007) 244–250.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (2) (2007) 251–256.
- Ghosh A & Kabir D C, Balance of competition and Intellectual Property Laws in the Indian pharmaceutical sector, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (3) (2007) 293–302.
- Ganguly N, Copyleft: An alternative to copyright in computer software and beyond, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (3) (2007) 303–313.
- Festo Corp vShokestsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co Ltd, 535US 722 (2002).
- Patodia D, Jain S & Shukla U,Doctrine of Equivalents: Scope & limitations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (3) (2007) 314–329.
- Chawla H S, Managing Intellectual property rights for better transfer and commercialization of agricultural technologies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (3) (2007) 330–340.
- Kumar S K, The current Indian Patent Regime and the scope of protection in agricultural biotechnology: Some issues and considerations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12(3) (2007) 341–348.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (3) (2007) 349–353.
- Singh H, Plant Variety Protection and food security: Lessons for developing countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (4) (2007) 391–399.
- Sengupta A, Parallel imports in the pharmaceutical sector: Must India be more liberal?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (4) (2007) 400–409.
- Mathur T, Application of Doctrine of Equivalents in patent infringement disputes, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (4) (2007) 410–421.
- Gupta A, Protection of databases in India: Copyright termination Sui Generisconception, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (4) (2007) 422–427.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12(4) (2007) 428–433.
- Guennif S & Lalitha N, TRIPS Plus Agreements and issues in access to medicines in developing countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (5) (2007) 471–479. Lalitha N, an Indian author, her name is not mentioned on the web but in mentioned in the article.
- Vibhaw N and Venkataraman A, Recording that Different Version – An Indian Raga, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (5) (2007) 480–487.
- Bhadra S & Majumdar A, Anton Piller Order in UK and its Possible Implications in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (5) (2007) 488–496.
- Masroof A, The registrability of unconventional trademarks in India and Sri Lanka: A comparative analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (5) (2007) 497–506.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (5) (2007) 507–515.
- Kahandawaarachchi T, Liability of internet service providers for third party online copyright infringement: A study of the US and Indian Laws, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (6) (2007) 553–561.
- Roberts G, Modern patenting – Quantity and quality, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (6) (2007) 562–571.
- Reddy J A & Chatterjee S, A critique of the Indian Law and approach towards protection of Geographical Indications with specific reference to genericide, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (6) (2007) 572–580.
- Gopalan R & Sivakumar S, Keeping Cashmere in Kashmir- The interface between GI and TK, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (6) (2007) 581–588.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12 (6) (2007) 589–597.
- Pareek A & Singh S, Concept of obviousness: Scenario post KSR Internationalv Teleflex Inc,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (1) (2008) 7–18.
- Mittal R & Aishwarya S, Comparative advertising: An eye for an eye making the consumers blind,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (1) (2008) 19–27.
- Janodia M D, Sreedhar D, LigadeV S, Pise A and Udupa N, Facets of technology transfer: A perspective of pharmaceutical industry,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (1) (2008) 28–34.
- Saha S & Keshri S, Challenges to copyrightable work in cyberspace,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (1) (2008) 35–42.
- Mishra N, Registration of non-traditional trademarks, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (1) (2008) 43–50.
- Kochhar S, Institutions and capacity building for the evolution of IPR Regime in India: Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (1) (2008) 51–56.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (1) (2008) 57–64.
- Ramanujan A, Reflections on the Indian accession to the Madrid Protocol,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (2) (2008) 111–117.
- Patel M and Saha S, Trademark issues in Digital Era,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (2) (2008) 118–128.
- Kumar A, Towards patentability of essentially biological processes,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (2) (2008) 129–138.
- Maheshwari V & Bhatnagar P, Small scale industries and IP management: Need to recognize intellectual assets,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (2) (2008) 139–144.
- Mitra S, Patent & Food Security – Opening the Pandora’s Box,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (2) (2008) 145–151.
- Kochhar S, Institutions and capacity building for the evolution of intellectual property rights regime in India: II — Ownership and management issues in agricultural research * ,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (2) (2008) 152–156.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (2) (2008) 157–164.
- Deepak J S, Protection of traditional handicrafts under Indian Intellectual Property Laws,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13(3) (2008) 197–207.
- Harshwardhan K S, Trade secrets: A secret still to unveil, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (3) (2008) 208–217.
- Chindalia S, Open source software: The future ahead,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (3) (2008) 218–224.
- Chakravarthy S, Shukla G Malla S and Suresh C P, Farmers’ rights in conserving plant biodiversity with special reference to North-East India,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (3) (2008) 225–233.
- Kumar J, Insurance coverage in intellectual property litigation,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (3) (2008) 234–238.
- Kochhar S, Institutions and capacity building for the evolution of intellectual property rights regime in India: III– Conformity and enforcement issues,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (3) (2008) 239–244.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (3) (2008) 245–252.
- Bergstra J A and Klint P, The software invention cube: A classification scheme for software inventions,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (4) (2008) 293–300.
- Rai R K, Battling with TRIPS: Emerging firm strategies of Indian pharmaceutical industry Post-TRIPS,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (4) (2008) 301–317.
- Gupta V K, India: IPR and the national security, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13(4) (2008) 318–325.
- Venkataraman K and Latha S S, Intellectual property rights, traditional knowledge and biodiversity of India,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13(4) (2008) 326–335.
- Kochhar S, Institutions and capacity building for the evolution of intellectual property rights regime in India: IV– Identification and disclosure of IP products for their IPR protection in plants and animals,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (4) (2008) 336–343.
- Thomas Zakir, IP Case Law Developments,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (4) (2008) 344–350.
- Singh A, Patent infringement: How to minimize the risk, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (4) (2008) 351–353.
- Gopalakrishnan N S, TRIPS Agreement and public health: An overview of international issues,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 395–400.
- Lalitha N, Doha Declaration and public health issues, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 401–413.
- Damodaran A D, Indian Patent Law in the post-TRIPS decade: S&T Policy appraisal,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 414–423.
- Khader F A, Transcending differences: The challenge for pharmaceuticals in the Post-TRIPS Indian Patent Regime, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 424–431.
- Nair G G, Impact of TRIPS on Indian pharmaceutical industry,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 432–441.
- Janodia M D, Chauhan A, Hakak S M, Sreedhar D, Ligade V S & Udupa N, Data exclusivity provisions in India: Impact on public health,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 442–446.
- Kuanpoth J, Appropriate Patent Rules in developing countries - Some deliberations based on Thai Legislation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 447–455.
- Nair M D, Compromising TRIPS: Brazil’s approach to tackle the HIV/AIDS imbroglio,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 456–463.
- Mathur H, Compulsory licensing under Section 92A: Issues and concerns,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 462–472.
- Pohl M, How to control the United States Pharmaceutical API Market using patents on new synthetic intermediate compounds,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 473–479.
- Vivekanandan V C, Transplanting Bayh-Dole Act- Issues at stake,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 480–485.
- Basheer S andKochupillai M, ‘Exhausting’ patent rights in India: Parallel imports and TRIPS compliance,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 486–497.
- Ohly D C, What’s ‘new’? - Isn’t it obvious?,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 498–508.
- Damodaran A, Traditional knowledge, intellectual property rights and biodiversity conservation: Critical issues and key challenges,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 509–513.
- Ragavan S, New paradigms for protection of biodiversity, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 514–522.
- Thomas Zakir, Legal issues in branding medicinal products, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 523–535.
- Kochhar S, Institutions and capacity building for the evolution of intellectual property rights regime in India: V – Analysis of review of TRIPS Agreement and R&D prospect in Indian agriculture under IPR Regime,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (5) (2008) 536–547.
- Raju K D, Intellectual property taxation: Need for a comprehensive Policy and Law in India,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (6) (2008) 563–573.
- Ambast S, Protecting Performers’ Rights: Does India need law reform?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (6) (2008) 574–582.
- Singh S, Insight into the nature of offence of copyright infringement,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (6) (2008) 583–589.
- Samaddar S G & Chaudhary B D, Practical insights into intellectual property strategy for a Technical Institute,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (6) (2008) 590–600.
- Bele M H & Derle D V, Analysis of patents pertaining to super disintegrants used in tablet manufacturing,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (6) (2008) 601–604.
- Kochhar S, Institutions and capacity building for the evolution of intellectual property rights regime in India: VI – Obligations and opportunities in handling plant varieties and agricultural biotechnology,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (6) (2008) 605–611.
- Thomas Z, IP Case Law developments,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13 (6) (2008) 612–621.
- Nagori B P and Mathur V, Basics of writing patent non-infringement and freedom-to-operate opinions,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (1) (2009) 7–13.
- Jain S, Parallel imports and trademark Law,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (1) (2009) 14–27.
- Ramanujan A, Methodology ofclaim construction after Phillipsv AWH Corp: The need for an alternative approach, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (1) (2009) 28–45.
- 376 F.3d 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
- Gopalan R, Bioinformatics: Scope of intellectual property protection,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (1) (2009) 46–51.
- Mukherjee U, Currency patents - The anticipated bust of an economy,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (1) (2009) 52–62.
- Hidalgo A, Analysis of the commercial use of Spanish inventions protected by patents between 1996 and 2006,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (1) (2009) 63–69.
- Shirwaikar P, Fashion copying and design of the Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (2) (2009) 113–121.
- Demunshi Y andChugh A, Patenting trends in marine bioprospecting based pharmaceutical sector,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (2) (2009) 122–130.
- Saha S, Patenting of internet and e-commerce: An international view,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (2) (2009) 131–141.
- Saha Shridhar M, Jain S K & Gautam V, Patent activity by patent agents in India,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (2) (2009) 142–148.
- Suman Y, Nishy P & Gupta V K, Trends in IT patents filed from India: An analysis,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (2) (2009) 149–152.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (2) (2009) 153–163.
- Gupta V K, Indian patents output in nanotechnology,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (2) (2009) 164–165.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR - Impact on developing countries,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (2) (2009) 166–167.
- Parvin M R, Patentability of plants: Technical and legal aspects,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (3) (2009) 203–213.
- Bhat P I, The role of collective bodies in protection of intellectual property rights in India,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (3) (2009) 214–225.
- Liu W, Establishing a safeguard system for intellectual property protection for Chinese Private Enterprises,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (3) (2009) 226–235.
- Shukla N & Sangal T, Generic drug industry in India: The counterfeit spin,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (3) (2009) 236–240.
- Nanda N, Diffusion of climate friendly technologies: Can compulsory licensing help?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (3) (2009) 241–246.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (3) (2009) 247–257.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR - Debate on evergreening of patents and IPA 2005,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (3) (2009) 258–259.
- Bansal I S, Sahu D, Bakshi G and Singh S, Evergreening – A controversial issue in pharma milieu,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (4) (2009) 299–306.
- Gupta M S, Sufficiency of disclosure in patent specification, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (4) (2009) 307–316.
- Khanna S R Vinoth and Ravindran S, Benefits of the London Agreement (2000) for Indian patent applicants,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (4) (2009) 317–320.
- Mishra P and Dutta A, Striking a balance between liability of internet service providers and protection of copyright over the internet: A need of the hour,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (4) (2009) 321–329.
- Lakshmi V Vijay and Patro A M, Intellectual property protection at border,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (4) (2009) 330–339.
- Sinha B, Joshi H and Ghosh P K, Challenges in creation and management of knowledge capitalin Technical Educational Institutions,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (4) (2009) 340–345.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR - How effective is the dispute settlement process?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (4) (2009) 346–348.
- Kant A, Section 3(d): ‘New’ Indian perspective,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (5) (2009) 385–396.
- Tomar V, Trademark licensing & franchising: Trends in transfer of rights,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (5) (2009) 397–404.
- Rai R K, The TRIPS Article 23 extension stalemate continues: A way-ahead for the developing countries,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (5) (2009) 405–422.
- Baruah A, Patent specification: Engineering the technical output of novel invention,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (5) (2009) 423–431.
- Janodia M D, Rso J V, Pandey S, Sreedhar D, Ligade V S and Udupa N, Impact ofpatents on Indian Pharma Industry’s growth and competency: A viewpoint of Pharmaceutical Companies in India,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (5) (2009) 432–436.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (5) (2009) 437–445.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR – DOHA Round & public health,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (5) (2009) 446–447.
- Saha T K, War on words in cyberspace- Legal constraints and conflicts between rights of privacy and freedom of speech,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (6) (2009) 489–500.
- Srihari Y, Padmajja S and Rao S Srinivasa, Implications of Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act (DPCPTRA) on Indian Pharma Industry,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (6) (2009) 501–512.
- Chakravarthy S, Importance of Assignment Agreements under Intellectual Property Laws in India,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (6) (2009) 513–522.
- The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (Act 9 of 1972).
- The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Act 2 of 1899).
- Sharma A, Indian perspective of fair dealing under Copyright Law: Lex Lata or Lex Ferenda?,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (6) (2009) 523–531.
- Thomas Z, IP CaseLaw Developments,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (6) (2009) 532–541.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR - How far have we gone with the DOHA Round?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14 (6) (2009) 542–543.
- Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Second Decade of Twenty-First Century (2010–2014) — IV
Abstract Views :105 |
PDF Views:78
Authors
Aqa Raza
1,
Kanika Malik
2
Affiliations
1 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat — 131 001, Haryana, IN
2 Council of Scientific & Industrial Research-National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi — 110 012, IN
1 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat — 131 001, Haryana, IN
2 Council of Scientific & Industrial Research-National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi — 110 012, IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 28, No 4 (2023), Pagination: 347-376Abstract
This Paper seeks to review the articles published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in the first half of the second decade of the twenty-first century from Volume 15 (1) (2010) to Volume 19 (6) (2014). This is the fourth paper on the theme ‘JIPR in IPR Research’ and proceeds with the same argument and method as developed and used in the previous three papers published on the theme ‘JIPR in IPR Research’. In this decade, two Special Issues on the themes ‘IPR and Agriculture’ and ‘Leveraging IP for Business Advantage’ were published with their separate guest editors. Compared to the previous decades, the articles published between 2010–2014 are maximum. Out of the total articles published between 1996–2014, the number of articles (251) published in this decade between 2010–2014 constitute 37.24 (point two four) compared to 32.64 (point six four) percent in 2005–2009, 19.58 (point five eight) percent in 2000–2004 and 10.53 (point five three) in 1996–1999.Keywords
JIPR, IP Statutes, Scholars, CSIR-NIScPR, CSIR-NISCAIR, IP Awareness, Articles, Copyright, Patents, Trade Marks, Geographical Indications, Trade Secrets, Industrial Design, Design, Integrated Circuit, Plant Varieties, TRIPS, WIPO, GATT, IPRs, Treaties, Agreement, Research, Case Law Development, Internet Service Provider, Amendments, Review, Handicrafts, Counterfeit Drugs, IP Publications, Dissemination of Knowledge, Creation of New Knowledge, Second Decade, Twenty-First Century.References
- Malik K and Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through the articles published in the last decade of twentieth-century (1996–1999) — I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 68–78.
- Malik K and Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through the articles published in the first decade of twenty-first century (2000–2004) — II, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 171–186.
- Raza A and Malik K, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through the articles published in the first decade of twenty-first century (2005–2009) — III, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 242-266.
- Carrier M A, The Pirate Bay, Grokster and Google, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (1) (2010) 7–18.
- Kochupillai M, The protection and utilization of Public Funded Intellectual Property Bill, 2008: A critique in the light of India’s innovation environment, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (1) (2010) 19–34.
- Gupta A, The scope of online service providers’ liability for copyright infringing third party content under the Indian Laws – The road ahead, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (1) (2010) 35–45.
- Act 14 of 1957.
- Ashok A, Economic rights of authors under Copyright Law: Some emerging judicial trends, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (1) (2010) 46–54.
- Jauhar A & Narnaulia S, Patenting life the American, European and Indian way, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (1) (2010) 55–65.
- Thomas Z, IP Case Law development, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (1) (2010) 66–73.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR - TRIPS & affordable healthcare: The concept of OSDD & Patent Pools, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (1) (2010) 74–76.
- Nayak A & Chatterjee S, Onset of mobile chip piracy in the domain of copyright infringement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (2) (2010) 117–121.
- Chopra S & Negi A, Role of intellectual property during recession, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (2) (2010) 122–129.
- Gupta V K, Insight into firms’ strategy for leveraging technological competences in Asia, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (2) (2010) 130–137.
- Thomas Z, IP Case Law developments, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (2) (2010) 138–145.
- Sreedharan S K, Bridging the time and tide –Traditional knowledge in the 21stcentury, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (2) (2010) 146–150.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR - World patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (2) (2010) 151–153.
- Mittal A, Patent linkage in India: Current scenario and need for deliberation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (3) (2010) 187–196.
- Bayer Corporation vCipla, Union of India 2009 (41) PTC 634 (Del).
- R Kalpana S, Rashmi H B & Rao N H, Nanotechnology patents as R&D indicators for disease management strategies in agriculture, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (3) (2010) 197–205.
- Barpujari I, The patent regime and nanotechnology: Issues and challenges, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (3) (2010) 206–213.
- Samaddar A B & Komal Chaul – A potential candidate for Geographical Indication, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (3) (2010) 214–219.
- Mir F A & Ain F, Legal protection of Geographical Indications in Jammu and Kashmir—A case study of Kashmiri handicrafts, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (3) (2010) 220–227.
- Liu W, Approaches to ensuring access to pharmaceuticals under the New China’s Patent Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (3) (2010) 228–234.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WIPO and IPR: Prevailing issues and emerging trends, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (3) (2010) 235–237.
- Kochhar S, How effective isSui GenerisPlant Variety Protection in India: Some initial feedback, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (4) (2010) 273–284.
- Mittal R, Analysis of the mysterious element of quality control in trademark licensing, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (4) (2010) 285–292.
- Choudhary V K, Protection of well known trademarks and weakening of honest concurrent user defense, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (4) (2010) 293–301.
- Rastogi T, IP audit: Way to a healthy organization, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (4) (2010) 302–309.
- Nair M D, TRIPS. WTO and IPR: The year 2009 in retrospect, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (4) (2010) 310–312.
- Barpujari I, Facilitating access or monopoly: Patent pools at the interface of patent and competition regimes, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (5) (2010) 345–356.
- Gupta R, Compulsory licensing under TRIPS: How far it addresses public health concerns in developing nations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (5) (2010) 357–363.
- Saha T K, Cyberspace-conflicting jurisdictional spheres of litigating IPR claims, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (5) (2010) 364–373.
- Negi A & Thakuria B J, Principles governing damages in trademark infringement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (5) (2010) 374–379.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR: Counterfeit drugs, Journal of Intellectual PropertyRights, 15 (5) (2010) 380–382.
- Watkins J M & Taylor M Z, Intellectual property protection and US foreign direct investment in emerging economies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (6) (2010) 415–428.
- Boztsoun N A O, Exploring the utility of Utility Models for fostering innovation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (6) (2010) 429–439.
- Martínez L M, Patent licensing: Global perspective and analysis of case studies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (6) (2010) 440–446.
- Junli Chang X Z, Bioinformatics databases: Intellectual property protection strategy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (6) (2010) 447–454.
- Sethi R, Ambush marketing – Need for legislation in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (6) (2010) 445–463.
- Ghazinoory S & Abdi M, Promoting nanotechnology patenting: A new experience in National Innovation System of Iran, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (6) (2010) 464–473.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR: Impact of Indian Patent Act 2005 on Indian pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 (6) (2010) 474–476.
- Ahmad T & Swain S R, Celebrity rights: Protection under IP Laws, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (1) (2011) 7–16.
- Anand N, Accommodating long term scientific progress: Patent prospects in the pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (1) (2011) 17–22.
- Sakthivel M, Is it broadcast or broadcasting? Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (1) (2011) 23–26.
- Ghazinoory S, Abedi S & Mashari B, Model for IP protection based on an empirical study of Iranian nanotechnology companies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (1) (2011) 27–34.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR: Protection of bioresources and traditional knowledge, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (1) (2011) 35–37.
- Kochhar S, TRIPS, Analysis of opportunities and challenges in IPR and agriculture in the Indian context, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 69–73.
- Jördens B P, Effective system of plant variety protection in responding to challenges of a changing world: UPOV perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 74–83.
- Strachan J M, Intellectual property rights for plants in the United States, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 84–87.
- Kochupillai M, The Indian PPV & FR Act, 2001: Historical and implementation perspectives, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 88–101.
- Kumar P S, Khan S M, Hora M & Rao M P, Implementation of Indian PPV&FR Act and Rules: Inadequacies leading to avoidable litigation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 102–106.
- Singh A P, Manchikanti P & Chawla H S, TRIPS, Sui GenerisIPR Lawsvis-à-visFarmers’ Rights in some Asian countries: Implications under the WTO, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 107–116.
- Kapur A, IPR Laws to protect innovation not restrict crop breeding - A rational approach, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 117–123.
- Sreedharan S K, Agricultural researchvis-à-visthe cresting IPR wave in the 21stcentury, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 124–130.
- Dewan M, IPR protection in agriculture: An overview, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 131–138.
- Sastry K R, Rashmi H B & Badri J, Research and development perspectives of transgenic cotton: Evidence from patent landscape studies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 139–153.
- Ramesha K P, Intellectual property rights regime for livestock agriculture in India - Present status and future prospects, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 154–162.
- Manchikanti P & Sengupta M, Agricultural machinery in India: IPR perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 163–169.
- Soam S K & Hussain M, Commercialization of indigenous health drinks as Geographical Indications, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 170–175.
- Spink J, The challenge of intellectual property enforcement for agriculture technology transfers, additives, raw materials, and finished goods against product fraud and counterfeiters, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 183–193.
- Nair M D, GATT, TRIPS, WTO and CBD – Relevance to agriculture, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 176–182.
- Sidhu A K, Managing intellectual property for agriculture inventions in the university, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 194–199.
- Vijayaraghavan K, Akshat M, Shruthi A & Chiranth C R, circumventing complex intellectual property hurdles to enable access to proven upstream technology for poverty alleviation and benefiting resource poor farmers: Case studies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 200–203.
- Sandal N & Kumar A, Role of freedom to operate in business with proprietary products, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2) (2011) 204–209.
- Kadri H & Saykhedar M, Post-TRIPS patenting trends in india with special reference to USA: A comparative analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (3) (2011) 217–224.
- Tse-Ping D, Chun-Hsien S & Hsiao I-Hsuan, Exuberance or bubble? Study of nano-based herbal medicine patents in the PR China, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (3) (2011) 225–234.
- Liu W, A critical review of China’s approach to limitation of the internet service provider’s liability: A comparative perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (3) (2011) 235–245.
- Silva E F da & Peralta P P, Collective Marks and Geographical Indications - Competitive strategy of differentiation and appropriation of intangible, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (3) (2011) 246–257.
- Kutty A A & Chakravarty S, The Competition-IP Dichotomy: Emerging challenges in technology transfer licenses, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (3) (2011) 258–266.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR: Recent happenings in WTO, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (3) (2011) 267–269.
- Ghafele R, Gibert B & Di Giammarino P, Driving innovation through patent application review: The power of crowdsourcing prior art search, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (4) (2011) 303–308.
- Sakthivel M, 4G Peer-to-Peer Technology – Is it covered by copyright?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (4) (2011) 309–312.
- Jethi M, Dealing ‘Fairly’ with software in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (4) (2011) 313–320.
- Mahajan M M, The emergence of new R&D paradigms in the Indian pharmaceutical industry: Post TRIPS period, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (4) (2011) 321–329.
- Tripathy I G, Surendra S & Sharma S, FDI flows into the Indian pharmaceutical industry: An analysis of trends and constraints, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (4) (2011) 330–334.
- Dahiya K, Cinematographic lyricists right to royalty: Myth or reality?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (4) (2011) 335–340.
- Nomani Md Z M & Rahman F, Intellection of Trade Secret and Innovation Laws in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (4) (2011) 341–350.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR: IPA 2005: Potential for disputes and litigation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (4) (2011) 351–353.
- Collan M & Heikkilä M, Enhancing patent valuation with the Pay-off Method, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (5) (2011) 377–384.
- Jeon J, Lee C and Park Y, How to use patent information to search potential technology partners in open innovation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (5) (2011) 385–393.
- Banerjee A & Agrawal A D, Morality of copyright – A critique in view of the ‘3 Idiots’ controversy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (5) (2011) 394–401.
- Sehgal D & Mathur S, Rights and duties of broadcasting organizations: Analysis of WIPO Treaty on the protection of broadcasting organizations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (5) (2011) 402–408.
- Lu B, Best mode disclosure for patent applications: An International and comparative perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (5) (2011) 409–417.
- Chakravarti D, Thadani K, Chablani V & Nayak A, Abrogating sovereign immunity in patent infringement cases in India: Retreating without disgrace, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (5) (2011) 418–425.
- Cook T, European intellectual property developments, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (5) (2011) 326–328.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR: Geographical Indication protection in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (5) (2011) 429–430.
- Himanshu V K, Patent monopoly and doctrine of exhaustion: Limits on exclusive right, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (6) (2011) 453–462.
- Kulkarni V & Konde V, Pre- and Post-Geographical indications registration measures for handicrafts in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (6) (2011) 463–469.
- Thapa R, Waiver solution in public health and pharmaceutical domain under TRIPS Agreement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (6) (2011) 470–476.
- Escobar-Andrae B, North-South Agreements on Trade and Intellectual Property beyond TRIPS: An analysis of US Bilateral Agreements in comparative perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (6) (2011) 477–499.
- Ahmad T & Choudhury P P, Rebirth of Opt-in System in copyright: Analysis in the light of ‘Google Books’ controversy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (6) (2011) 500–508.
- Paul S & Chugh A, Assessing the role of Ayurvedic ‘Bhasms’ as Ethno-nanomedicine in the Metal Based Nanomedicine Patent Regime, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (6) (2011) 509–515.
- Cook T, The role of Europe in the development of Related Rights Laws, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (6) (2011) 516–518.
- Nair M D, TRIPS, WTO and IPR: Biodiversity protection – A critical issue, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (6) (2011) 519–521.
- Yang D, Patent system measurements: Review, critique and proposal, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (1) (2012) 7–19.
- Chen R & Cheng-Rong H, Changes and challenges in using the formality examination for Utility Models in Taiwan, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (1) (2012) 20–26.
- Ma Zhong-fa & Gao Wei-na, Impact of the ‘Tomato Garden’ Software Internet Piracy Case on combating copyright infringement in China, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (1) (2012) 27–36.
- Yoon B & Lee S, Applicability of patent information in technological forecasting: A sector-specific approach, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (1) (2012) 37–45.
- Liu W, Models for collective management of copyright from an international perspective: Potential changes for enhancing performance, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (1) (2012) 46–54.
- Vinayan S, Intellectual property rights and the handloom sector: Challenges in implementation of Geographical Indications Act, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (1) (2012) 55–63.
- Jain V & Kiran R, Technology management strategies and small and medium enterprises of Punjab manufacturing: A use-based sector analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (1) (2012) 64–72.
- Cook T, Stem cell patenting in the European Union, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (1) (2012) 73–75.
- Yang D, Compulsory licensing: For better or for worse, the done deal lies in the balance, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (1) (2012) 76–81.
- Ryu Tae-Kyu & Han Yoo-Jin, Indicator for evaluating national patent performance: Comparative analysis among the 30 OECD countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (2) (2012) 103–110.
- Ahmad T & Dan S, Comparative analysis of copyright protection of databases: The path to follow, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (2) (2012) 111–121.
- Sharma R & Saxena K K, Strengthening the patent regime: Benefits for developing countries - A survey, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (2) (2012) 122–132.
- Ramos B D, Fernandes L R R de M V & De Souza C G, An overview of Geographical Indications in Brazil, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (2) (2012) 133–140.
- Arumugam V & Jain K, Technology transfer from higher technical institutions to the industry in India - A case study of IIT Bombay, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (2) (2012) 141–151.
- Sinha R, Insurance patents: Indian scenario, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (2) (2012) 152–156.
- Cook T, Online intermediary liability in the European Union, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (2) (2012) 157–159.
- Yang D, Software protection: Copyrightability vs Patentability? Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (2) (2012) 160–164.
- Koo D, Trial to confirm the scope of a patent in Korea, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (3) (2012) 185–194.
- Vaish V & Haji M, Is there a need to ‘Substantially Modify’ the terms of the TRIPS Agreement?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (3) (2012) 195–208.
- Yu Y & Zhang L, Analysis of enforcement mechanism of Section 337 of the US Tariff Act through perspectives in law and economics, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (3) (2012) 209–217.
- Mazzocchi C & Sali G, Classification of Geographical Indications: A proposal of codification, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (3) (2012) 218–225.
- Uluko H, Oyewunmi A & Mandewo G, Protecting Geographical Indications in Malawi: Current situation and future prospects, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (3) (2012) 226–234.
- Sebastian T, Copyright World’ and access to information: Conjoinedviathe Internet, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (3) (2012) 235–242.
- Cook T, Exceptions and limitations in European Union Copyright Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (3) (2012) 243–245.
- Yang D, Colourmarkability: Registrable in few nations, but debatable among many!Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (3) (2012) 246–250.
- Nair G G, Fernandes A & Parmar K R, Post-TRIPS thrust triggers for Indian pharmaceuticals in the IP context, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (4) (2012) 273–283.
- Verma S K, IP protection of software and software contracts in India: A legal quagmire!Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (4) (2012) 284–295.
- Cook T, How IPRs, like nature, Abhor a vacuum, and what can happen when they fill it - lacunae and overlaps in intellectual property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (4) (2012) 296–304.
- Nair M D, TRIPS and access to affordable drugs, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (4) (2012) 305–314.
- Yang D, Marks and brands: Conceptual, operational and methodological comparisons, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (4) (2012) 315–323.
- Thomas Z, Overview of changes to the Indian Copyright Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (4) (2012) 324–334.
- Act 27 of 2012.
- Basheer S, Khettey D, Nandy S & Mitra S, Exhausting copyrights and promoting access to education: An empirical take, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (4) (2012) 335–347.
- Kankanala K C, Business value from intellectual property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 369–373.
- Thakur A V, Branding and business management: Leveraging brand names for business advantage, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 374–384.
- Mukundan R & Jain K, Enhancing a firm’s strategic Intellectual Property Management System – The role of patent quality, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 385–389.
- Meyer R H, A review and analysis of a selection of India’s Innovation, Entrepreneurship, Knowledge Management and Technology Policy Literature, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 390–399.
- Pandsey N & Agarrwal S, Taking an independent inventor’s inventions to the market - Challenges and issues, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 400–405.
- Nithyananda K V, Alchemy and IPR – Monetizing intellectual property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 406–416.
- Punnoose S & Shobhana V, The Intellectual Property Audit, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 417–424.
- Kankanala K C & Mishra R, The strategy of commons, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 425–429.
- Kalluri S, Traditional knowledge and patent strategy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 430–436.
- Kalamadi S, Intellectual property and the business of Sports Management, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 437–442.
- Garon J M, The heart of the deal: Intellectual property aspects in the Law and Business of Entertainment, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 443–453.
- Kewalramni N & Sandeep H M, Character merchandising, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 454–462.
- Scaria A G, Does India need Digital Rights Management Provisions or better Digital Business Management Strategies?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 463–477.
- Radhakrishnan V, IP strategy for drug discovery: A dedicated research firm’s perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 478–483.
- Thakur V P S & Ramacha S, Pharmaceutical business strategy: A generics perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 484–496.
- Nair M S, Drug prices - How much is too much?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (5) (2012) 497–500.
- Vasudeva V N, Open source software paradigm and intellectual property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (6) (2012) 511–520.
- Ashok A, Technology protection measures and the Indian Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012: A comment, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (6) (2012) 521–531.
- Zhao L, Information disclosure mechanism for technological protection measures in China, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (6) (2012) 532–538.
- Jun S, Park S S & Jang D S, Patent management for technology forecasting: A case study of the Bio-Industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (6) (2012) 539–546.
- Andanda P, Striking a balance between intellectual property protection of traditional knowledge, cultural preservation and access to knowledge, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (6) (2012) 547–558.
- Manghutay A G, The Berne Convention and the Iranian Law: Negative implications of the differences in the scope of application, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (6) (2012) 559–567.
- Cook T, Has an agreement been reached on a Unitary Patent and a Unified Patent Court for Europe, and if so, what is it?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (6) (2012) 568–572.
- Yang D, Patent trolls: Legit enforcers or harrassers?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17 (6) (2012) 573–577.
- Dodeja K D, The sheer ‘Film’ of protection - An exercise in exhaustion, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (1) (2013) 7–14.
- Reddy G B and Kadri H A, Local working of patents - Law and implementation in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (1) (2013) 15–27.
- Liu W & Gu Z, Delineating the scope of protection for technological protection measures in an equitable way: Approaches of US & EU - A frame of reference for China’s legislation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (1) (2013) 28–38.
- Fa-Chang C, Legal protection of intellectual property: The changing attitude of US and its influence on Taiwan, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (1) (2013) 39–46.
- Zhongfa M, Reconsideration of the essence of a patent and the missions of patent institution: Low rate of patented technology commercialization in China, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (1) (2013) 47–55.
- Lo C C, Shih-yun L & Hsieh W H, Patent enforcement strategies in the United States: An integrative framework, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (1) (2013) 56–66.
- Huaiwen H, Amendment to claims of granted patent under Chinese Patent Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (1) (2013) 67–71.
- Patent Reexamination Board (PRB)vJiangsu Xiansheng Pharm Co Ltd (Case Number Zhixingzi 17/2011).
- Tehrani P M & Manap N A, Urgency and benefits of protecting Iranian carpets using Geographical Indications, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (1) (2013) 72–82.
- Cook T, The cumulative protection of designs in the European Union and the role in such protection of Copyright, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (1) (2013) 83–87.
- Agitha T G, Global public health: Should the Trade Forum Reign?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (1) (2013) 88–92.
- Bedi N, Bedi P M S & Sooch B S, Patenting and R&D in Indian pharmaceutical industry: Post-TRIPS scenario, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (2) (2013) 105–110.
- Raju K D, The inevitable connection between Intellectual Property and Competition Law: Emerging jurisprudence and lessons for India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (2) (2013) 111–122.
- Act 12 of 2003.
- Act 39 of 2009.
- Mitra D & Modi A, Pay ‘n’ Play: Public performance of Sound Recordingsvis-à-visCopyright Infringement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (2) (2013) 123–132.
- Li W & Xue-Kai X, Technology development and legislation progress: Third party liabilities of internet service providers in China Tort Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (2) (2013) 133–142.
- Liu X, A study on global intellectual property right governance: From the perspective of StructureFunctionalism, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (2) (2013) 143–157.
- Wardhan P & Manchikanti P, A relook at inventors’ rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (2) (2013) 168–173.
- Lukose L P, Minors’ rights under Intellectual Property Rights Laws: A myth or reality?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (2) (2013) 174–180.
- Cook T, The future of copyright protection in the European Union, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (2) (2013) 181–185.
- Agitha T G, Intellectual property regime and developing country health concerns, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (2) (2013) 186–191.
- Singh H R & Singh P R, Entertainment NetworkvSuper Cassette Industries: Compulsory licensing in the copyright demystified, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (3) (2013) 201–211.
- Entertainment Network (India) LtdvSuper Cassette Industries Ltd (2008) 37 PTC 353 (SC).
- Kant A, Efficacy’ Factors under Section 3(d): A ‘Law and Economics’ perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (3) (2013) 212–229.
- Collan M & Kyläheiko K, Forward-looking valuation of strategic patent portfolios under structural uncertainty, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (3) (2013) 230–241.
- Asif E, Exclusion of diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical methods from patentability, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (3) (2013) 242–250.
- Jain R and Rod M, Intellectual property management: Assessing stakeholder knowledge regarding obtaining valid patent rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (3) (2013) 251–258.
- Qinghai L, Sizong W, Chen S & Junzhe J, Reputation building to reduce risk of IP litigation and infringement allegation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (3) (2013) 259–271.
- Lalitha N, Protecting traditional knowledge in Siddha System of medicine, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (3) (2013) 272–282.
- Cook T, European Union Trademark Law and its proposed revision, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (3) (2013) 283–286.
- Agitha T G, TRIPS Agreement and public health: The Post Doha Crises, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (3) (2013) 287–293.
- Kant A, An attempt at quantification of ‘Efficacy’ factors under Section 3(d) of the Indian Patents Act, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (4) (2013) 303–315.
- Bhardwaj R, Raju K D & Padmavati M, The impact of patent linkage on marketing of generic drugs, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (4) (2013) 316–322.
- Ravi B, Gene patents in India: Gauging Policy by an analysis of the grants made by the Indian Patent Office, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (4) (2013) 232–329.
- Piekut M, Polarization of the European Union: Patent activity and R&D expenditure, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (4) (2013) 330–337.
- Zekos G I, Interrelation of intellectual property rights and competitiveness: FDI inwards and FDI outwards, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (4) (2013) 338–350.
- Gupta J, John Doe Copyright injunctions in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (4) (2013) 351–359.
- Matveev A G, Copyright regulation in Russia: Rejection of classical theories or legislative mistakes?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (4) (2013) 360–368.
- The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (as amended on September 28, 1979), https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/283693 (accessed on 26 May 2023).
- Manap N A, Hambali S N & Tehrani P M, Intellectual creation in database: A superfluous test?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (4) (2013) 369–376.
- Cook T, How Europe has learnt how to deal with exclusions from patentability, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (4) (2013) 377–381.
- Agitha T G, Impact of IP on public health: The developed country scenario, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (4) (2013) 382–389.
- Cook T, Revision of the European Union Regime on Customs Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (5) (2013) 485–490.
- Agitha T G, Alternative incentive models delinking R&D costs from pharmaceutical product price, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (5) (2013) 491–498.
- Barpujari I and Nanda N, Weak IPRs as impediments to technology transfer- Findings from select Asian countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (5) (2013) 399–409.
- Dulakakhoria S & Jana T, Mapping innovation growth in the sports industry through Patent Data Mining, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (5) (2013) 410–418.
- Shen W, Protecting layout designs on printed circuit boards in China and some key industrial countries - New Regulatory Regime from a Law and Economics perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (5) (2013) 419–438.
- Bucasio R de P, da Dilva E F, Fierro I M & Peralta P P, Pharmaceutical trademark examination and its implications for self-medication: Parameters and examples in Brazil, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (5) (2013) 439–447.
- Venkatesh P & Pal S, Determinants and valuation of Plant Variety Protection in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (5) (2013) 448–456.
- Hemmige N, Piracy in the internet age, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (5) (2013) 457–464.
- Act 21 of 2000.
- Wu H & Qu H, The Copyright Law of China in knowledge revolution and economic globalization: Modernization, Internationalization and localization, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (5) (2013) 465–474.
- Sattar A, Mehmood T, Malik W S & Subhan Q A, Patenting, licensing, trade, foreign direct investment and economic growth: A panel data analysis of middle and low income countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (5) (2013) 475–484.
- Jinjin W, Xiaobao P, Wei S, Xuehe Z, Xiaoyan S & Yuan Y, Technical standards and Patent Pools: Antecedents, formation and distinctions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (6) (2013) 511–522.
- Liu Y, The tale of Viagra patents: Comparative studies of the global challenges in China and other countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (6) (2013) 523–533.
- Lo C C, Strategic dimensions of International Patent Litigation – The experience of Taiwanese firms in the US legal jurisdiction, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (6) (2013) 534–547.
- Chen R, Hsien-Tsung K & Ming-Hong W, Determining design patent similarity based on the Ordinary Observer Test, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (6) (2013) 548–555.
- Gavrilovic N, Using YouTube: Practical consequences of the approach adopted by EU Copyright Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (6) (2013) 556–565.
- Neethu R & Shakeri Z, My religion: My ‘Copy’ ‘Right’, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (6) (2013) 566–575.
- Dhamotharan P G & Selvaraj K N, Determining consumer preference and willingness to pay for GI registered bananas, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (6) (2013) 576–583.
- Cook T, The progress to date with the Unitary European Patent and the Unified Patent Court for Europe, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (6) (2013) 584–588.
- Agitha T G, Global governance for facilitating access to medicines: Role of World Health Organization, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18 (6) (2013) 589–595.
- Nair G G & Fernandes A, Patent system measurements: Review, critique and proposal, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (1) (2014) 7–17.
- Baltatzis A & Marvin S, Recent pharmaceutical patent decisions in the United States, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (1) (2014) 18–26.
- Lei Z, Beyond the US borders: A primary analysis of extraterritorial application of US Patent Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (1) (2014) 27–32.
- Bagheri S K & Casprini E, Intellectual property paradoxes in developing countries: The case of software IP protection in Iran, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (1) (2014) 33–42.
- Chen R, Sung-Yun S & Su-Ping T, Design patents for animated images: Development trends, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (1) (2014) 43–48.
- Anson C J & Pavithran K B, Pokkali rice production under Geographical Indication Protection: The attitude of farmers, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (1) (2014) 49–53.
- Cook T, The proposal for a Directive on the Protection of Trade Secrets in EU Legislation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (1) (2014) 54–58.
- Pai Y, Standards-Essential Patents: A prolegomena, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (1) (2014) 59–66.
- Nair G G, Fernandes A & Nair K, Landmark pharma patent jurisprudence in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2) (2014) 79–88.
- Higgins B W & Lessler J P, The weakening of pharmaceutical method patents: The Federal Circuit Addresses the ‘FDA Conundrum’, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2) (2014) 89–96.
- MomentaPharmaceuticals vAmphastar Pharmaceuticals 686 F. 3d 1348 (Fed Cir. 2012).
- AstraZenecavApotex669 F. 3d 1370 (Fed Cir. 2012).
- Bayer ScheringPharma AGvLupin 676 F. 3d 1316 (Fed Cir. 2012).
- Köster C, Oppositions against European patents: Three successful examples of oppositions lodged by indian opponents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2) (2014) 97–103.
- Pusceddu P, Access to medicines in developing countries and Free Trade Agreements: The case of the US-DR-CAFTA with focus on Costa Rica, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2) (2014) 104–112.
- Jeitschko T D and Zhang N, On the challenges facing patent pooling in biotechnology, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2) (2014) 113–122.
- Yu Y, Reflections on recent developments of statutory public interests in patent-based Section 337 proceedings, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2) (2014) 123–132.
- Jankowska M M, Ghostwriting in Polish Copyright Law – A new perspective needed?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2) (2014) 133–140.
- Cook T, The Court of Justice recasts the EU Patent Term Extension System, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2) (2014) 141–145.
- Pai Y, The rational basis for FRANDly courts denying injunctive relief for SEPs infringement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (2) (2014) 146–156.
- Mysore S, Technology transfer and commercialization – Innovative model for strengthening research and industry linkages and valuation through public private partnership in agriculture, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (3) (2014) 167–176.
- Ramli N and Zainol Z A, Intellectual property ownership model in Academia: An analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (3) (2014) 177–188.
- Samuel M P, Sastry R K and Venkattakumar R, Status and prospects of IP regime in India: Implications for agricultural education, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (3) (2014) 189–201.
- Xu C, Comparative analysis of intellectual property between China and the West: A cultural perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (3) (2014) 202–208.
- Nair G G, Nair K and Fernandes A, India’s options for improving affordable access to lifesaving patented medicines, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (3) (2014) 209–217.
- Pohl M, Patent infringement by ANDA filing, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (3) (2014) 218–222.
- Rahman S S, Industrial design in different jurisdictions: A comparison of laws, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (3) (2014) 223–228.
- Cook T, The New EU Guidelines on Technology Transfer Agreements, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (3) (2014) 229–233.
- Tyagi S, Mahajan V and Nauriyal D K, Innovations in Indian drug and pharmaceutical industry: Have they impacted exports?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (4) (2014) 243–252.
- Lath A, Analysing the pitfalls of Indian patent injunctions based on fear of infringement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (4) (2014) 253–259.
- Suman A and Pandey D, Patent trends in ICAR institutes - A review, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (4) (2014) 260–265.
- Zhan Y, Problems of Enforcement of Patent Law in China and its ongoing fourth amendment, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (4) (2014) 266–271.
- Kumar A, Internet Intermediary (ISP) Liability for contributory copyright infringement in USA and India: Lack of uniformity as a trade barrier, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (4) (2014) 272–281.
- Petridis S, Comparative issues on copyright protection for films in the US and Greece, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (4) (2014) 282–292.
- Cook T, Territoriality and jurisdiction in EU IP Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (4) (2014) 293–297.
- Unni V K, Exploring sovereign immunity in copyright infringement: How India can learn from the global experience, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (5) (2014) 307–314.
- Dey S and Jana T, E-waste recycling technology patents filed in India - An analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (5) (2014) 315–324.
- Chakrabarti G, Need of data exclusivity: Impact on access to medicine, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (5) (2014) 325–336.
- Zekos G I, Denying patentability of scientific theories, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (5) (2014) 337–346.
- Hanchinal R R, Agrawal R C, Prakash R, Stephen T & Jaiswal J, Impact of awareness programmes and capacity building in Farmers’ Plant Variety Registration under the PPV&FR Act, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (5) (2014) 347–352.
- Cook T, The New European Commission and its work plan for EU intellectual property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (5) (2014) 353–357.
- Wilson N, The Supreme Court clarifies Indian patent invalidity proceedings, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (5) (2014) 358–360.
- Kacheria A, MayovPrometheus: The eternal conundrum of PatentabilityvsPatent-Eligibility, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (6) (2014) 371–377.
- Joshi O, Roy A & Janodia M, Supplementary protection certificate provisions for pharmaceutical and biotechnological products in Europe: An era after Medeva and Georgetown Decisions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (6) (2014) 378–386.
- Medeva BV v Comptroller Genera of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks C-322/10 (CJEU, 24 November 2011).
- Georgetown University, University of Rochester, Loyola University of Chicago v Comptroller Genera of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks C-422/10 (CJEU, 24 November 2011).
- Sinha R, Patent insurance: A roadmap, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (6) (2014) 387–394.
- Jefferson D J, Camacho A B & Chi-Ham C L, towards a balanced regime of intellectual property rights for agricultural innovations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (6) (2014) 395–403.
- Acquah D O, Balancing or lobbying? On access to medicines, border measures and the European Parliament’s amendments to the proposed EU Trademark Rules, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (6) (2014) 404–412.
- Chin-Lung L, Yu-Ting C, Sheg-Hsien L & Yuan-Kai C, Business strategies in intellectual property rights: An example of patent disputes solutions in the Taiwan High-Tech industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (6) (2014) 413–422.
- Cook T, Three dimensional trade marks in European Union, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (6) (2014) 423–427.
- Wilson N, Patent Office Examination Guidelines for pharmaceuticals applications, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 19 (6) (2014) 428–430.
- Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Second Decade of Twenty-First Century (2015–2019) - V
Abstract Views :34 |
PDF Views:31
Authors
Aqa Raza
1,
Kanika Malik
2
Affiliations
1 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat — 131 001, Haryana, IN
2 Council for Scientific & Industrial Research–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi - 110 012, IN
1 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat — 131 001, Haryana, IN
2 Council for Scientific & Industrial Research–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi - 110 012, IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 28, No 5 (2023), Pagination: 461-482Abstract
This Paper seeks to review the articles published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in the second half of the second decade of the twenty-first century from Volume 20 (1) (2015) to Volume 24 (6) (2019). This is the fifth paper on the theme 'JIPR in IPR Research‘ and proceeds with the same method and arguments as adopted and developed in the previous four papers published on the theme. In this decade, a total of 144 articles were published including one Special Issue on the theme 'New Technologies, Climate Change and IPR‘. These 144 articles were published in 30 issues of 5 volumes. JIPR in this decade published 6 regular issues in Volumes 20 (2015) and 22 (2017). Whereas, the Issues 4 and 5 of Volume 21 (2016); Issues 2 and 3, and 4 and 5 of Volume 23 (2018); and Issues (1) and (2), (3) and (4), and (5) and (6) of Volume 24 (2019) were published jointly. Out of total articles published in JIPR till Volume 24, the number of articles published in this decade (144) constitutes 17.60 (point six zero) percent, and the contribution of this decade (2015–2019) is 19.27 (point two seven) percent.Keywords
JIPR, IP Statutes, Scholars, CSIR-NIScPR, CSIR-NISCAIR, IP Awareness, Articles, Copyright, Patents, Trade marks, Geographical Indications, Trade Secrets, Industrial Design, Design, Integrated Circuit, Plant Varieties, TRIPS, WIPO, IPRs, Treaties, AReferences
- Malik K & Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through the articles published in the last decade of twentieth-century (1996–1999) — I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1)(2023) 68–78.
- Malik K & Raza A, Contribution of Journal of IntellectualProperty Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through thearticles published in the first decade of twenty-first century(2000–2004) — II, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights,28 (2) (2023) 171–186.
- Raza A & Malik K, Contribution of Journal of IntellectualProperty Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through thearticles published in the first decade of twenty-first century(2005–2009) — III, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights,28 (3) (2023) 242–266.
- Raza A & Malik K, Contribution of Journal of IntellectualProperty Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through thearticles published in the second decade of twenty-firstcentury (2010–2014) — IV, Journal of Intellectual PropertyRights, 28 (4) (2023) 347–376.
- Hanchinal R R, Providing intellectual property protection tofarmers‘ varieties in India under the Protection of PlantVarieties & Farmers‘ Rights Act, 2001, Journal ofIntellectual Property Rights, 20 (1) (2015) 7–18.
- Sastry K R, Shrivastava A &Venkateshwarlu G, Assessmentof current trends in R&D of chitin-based technologies inagricultural production-consumption systems using PatentAnalytics, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (1)(2015) 19–38.
- Panja S, Majumdar P, Sarkar B K, Mukim K K&Hati A,global research on medical cotton – evidence from PatentLandscape Study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20(1)(2015) 39–50.
- Pathak H, The jurisdictional dilemma surrounding theIntellectual Property Appellate Board, Journal of IntellectualProperty Rights, 20 (1) (2015) 51–59.
- Cook T, The restricted act of making available andcommunication to the public in the European Union, Journalof Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (1) (2015) 60–66. 10 Wilson N, Guidelines for access and benefit sharing for utilization of biological resources based on Nagoya Protocol effective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (1) (2015) 60–66.
- The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (Act 18 of 2003).
- Srivastava M, Chaudhary V &Pilania D S, intellectual property rights on plant varieties in India: A sector-wise analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 81–88.
- The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers‘ Rights Act, 2001 (Act 53 of 2001).
- Yamanbhai I & Smith R D, To what extent are pharmaceutical prices determined by patents? A case study of oncology medicines in Thailand, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 89–95.
- Xu-kun W, Qu Z, Kun D & Shanshan Z, Studies of Chinese intellectual property: Academic basis and development idea, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 96–103.
- Shrivastava S, Verma H N &Saha R, Strategies for technical assessment via Patent Analysis − A case study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 104–111.
- Kuanpoth J, Intellectual property and transparency in trade negotiations: The experience of Thailand, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 112–121.
- Cook T, The restricted acts of reproduction and distribution in EU Copyright Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 122–126.
- Wilson N, Speedy patent application examination at the Indian Patent Office: Impact of Nitto Denko Corporation Case, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 127–130.
- Sapatnekar A M, Doctrine of Willful Patent Infringement: Evolution under American Patent Law and need of further research, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 139–146.
- Joshi O, Roy A &Janodia M, PTE provisions relating to pharmaceutical products in Australia in comparison with European SPC and USA PTE, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 147–154.
- Xin L & Xiang Y, Potential challenges of 3D printing technology on patent enforcement and considerations for countermeasures in China, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 155–163.
- Rahman Md R, Protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions in Bangladesh, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 164–171.
- Hsu Shun-liang, Fair and equitable exceptions for farming practice in plant IPR protection in Taiwan, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 172–184.
- Cook T, Update on the Unitary Patent Court and the European Patent with Unitary Effect, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 185–188.
- Nair M D, Indo-US IPR Conundrum, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 189–191.
- Singh A, Suman T &Thripura V, interfaces and synergies between intellectual property rights and Consumer Protection Law in India: An analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4) (2015) 201–209.
- Chingale R R&Srikrishna D, Software Patent in India: A comparative judicial and empirical overview, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4) (2015) 210–222.
- Fatokun O, Hassali M A A& Ibrahim M I M, Characterizing pharmaceuticals on data exclusivity in Malaysia, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4) (2015) 223–229.
- Saidin O K, Transplantation of Foreign Law into Indonesian Copyright Law: The victory of Capitalism Ideology on Pancasila Ideology, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4) (2015) 230–249.
- Pawar M, Patent portfolio analysis of hair/scalp cosmeceuticals, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4)(2015) 250–263.
- Cook T, Enforcement Directive and harmonisation of remedies for intellectual property infringement in the EU, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4) (2015) 264–269.
- Kaur A & Chaturvedi R, Compulsory licensing of drugs and pharmaceuticals: Issues and dilemma, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 297–287.
- Kumar V & Sinha K, Status and challenges of intellectual property rights in agriculture innovation in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 288–296.
- Lenin B K & Rohatgi H, Exceptions and limitation of Patent Rights and its enforcement in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 297–304.
- Malwadkar P S & Pandey M, Study of Patents filed in India in mechanical engineering sector, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 305–319.
- Lertdhamtewe P, Reinventing Thailand‘s plant protection regime, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 320–329.
- Zhang H & Yang X, Appropriate patent protection for industries at different levels of technology: Evidence from China, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 330–338.
- Kumar A & Mishra A, Gene patenting vis-a-vis notion of patentability, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 349–362.
- Mysore S, Technology commercialization through licensing: Experiences and lessons-A case study from Indian horticulture sector, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 363–374.
- Manjunatha B L, Rao D U M, Dastagiri M B, Sharma J P & Burman R R, Need for Government intervention in regulating seed sale price and trait fee: A case of Bt cotton, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 375–387.
- Chakraverty P, Effective applicability of Sections 65A and 65B of Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 using case study of digital watermarks, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 388–397.
- The Copyright (Amendment) Act 2012 (Act 27 of 2012). Vide Notification No. 29 dated 8 June 2012, Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 1.
- The Copyright Act, 1957 (Act 14 of 1957).
- Burhan M & Jain S K, Management of intellectual property and technology transfer by public funded research organizations in India: A case of CSIR, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 398–410.
- Wilson N, New Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules 2015 - Impact of Court Orders at the Indian Patent Office, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 411–412.
- Kochhar S, Indian perspective for sustainable development agenda and functional IPR and ABS domains in agriculture, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 7–15.
- Arora S & Chaturvedi R, Section 3(d): Implications and key concerns for pharmaceutical sector, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 16–26.
- Han J & Lee H J, Study on patent trust system in Korea, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 27–37.
- Jain B, Impact of granting data exclusivity in agro-chemical sector, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 38–41.
- Singh V, Chakraborty K & Vincent L, Patent database: Their importance in prior art documentation and patent search, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 42–56.
- Cook T, New European Union trade mark regime and the institutionalization within it of the co-existence of National and European Union Trade Mark Rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 57–61.
- Manjunatha B L, Rao D U M, Dastagiri M B, Sharma J P & Burman R R, New Indian Seeds Bill: Stakeholders‘ policy advocacies to enact, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2) (2016) 73–88.
- Bill LII of 2004.
- Viswanath R, Demystifying the Indian FRAND Regime: The interplay of competition and intellectual property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2) (2016) 89–95.
- Bortey H M &Mpanju F, Adoption of Plant Breeders‘ Rights System: Perceived implication for food, seed security and sovereignty in Ghana, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2) (2016) 96–104.
- Sharma A, Investor-State dispute settlement mechanism and intellectual property matters, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2) (2016) 105–109.
- Manap N A, Shapjee R B, Tehrani P M & Shariff A A bin Mohd, Protecting R&D inventions through intellectual property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2)(2016) 110–116.
- Wilson N, Computer Related Inventions (CRIs) revisited by Indian Patent Office – finalizing the CRI guidelines – Third attempt, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2) (2016) 117–119.
- Kumar A, Protecting smell marks: Breaking conventionality, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 129–139.
- Dountio J O, The Indian protection and utilisation of public funded Intellectual Property Bill, 2008: Does it secure access to medicines?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 140–148.
- Mehrotra B &Saberwal G, Patents protecting biologics or small molecule drugs are litigated, not others awarded to drug discovery companies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 149–156.
- Shaikh Shabib-Ahmad &Londhe B R, Intricacies of software protection: A Techno-Legal Review, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 157–165.
- Bakhtiarvand M, Legal nature and protection of domain names with emphasis on Iranian Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 166–174.
- Garg K C & Srivastava J, Knowledge structure of IPR as reflected by the content analysis of papers published in Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 175–179.
- Cook T, The differing protective scope of registered trade marks in Europe, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3)(2016) 180–183.
- Dhankar D, Commercialisation and biopiracy of genetic resources in the 21st Century: The imminent need for stronger regulation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 193–210.
- Mehrotra D, Sabitha S, Nagpal R & Mattas N, Landscape analysis of patent dataset, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 211–225.
- Amaral C E &Forcellini F A, Patent development and filing in Brazil: Application of value stream mapping to optimize the patent generating process of a company, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 226–237.
- Gogoi J, ‗Judima‘ the traditional rice wine of Dimasacommunity of Assam: A potential candidate for GI registration, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 238–242.
- Jui Chia-Wei, Trappey A J C & Fu Chien-Chung, Method of claim-based technology analysis for strategic innovation management – Using TPP-related patents as case examples, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 243–259.
- Bhagwat M, Kaushik G &Shivpuje V, Second medical use patenting: A review of practices across different jurisdictions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 260–264.
- Lukose P, Copyright issues in legal research and writing, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 275–282.
- Meena R S, Possession and transfer of copyrights of a cinematograph film, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 283–287.
- Devi S & Padmavati M, Biodiversity monitoring: A pre-condition to access and benefit sharing under the Indian Biological Diversity Act, 2002, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 288–294.
- Kansal V, Reporters‘ copyright in verbatim transcription and audio record of an extempore speech: Why the UK Act is more lenient than India‘s?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 295–303.
- Alkhasawneh A A, The legal system for the protection of geographical indications: A study in Jordanian and Comparative Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 304–326.
- Ghosh E, What should it take to be well-known? Fashioning an evidence-for-benefits matrix for ‗well-known marks‘ under Indian Trademark Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 327–336.
- Deshpande N A & Nagendra A, Climate mitigation technologies–Perspective based on patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 337–346.
- Vats N K, Geographical indication–The factors of rural development and strengthening economy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 347–354.
- Cook T, ―BREXIT‖ and intellectual property protection in the UK and the EU, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 356–361.
- Agarwal P, Impact of TPP on international, regional and other plurilateral IP norm setting, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (1) (2017) 7–15.
- Joshi O U, Roy A &Janodia M, Comparative quantitative analysis of Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) in Europe, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (1) (2017) 16–22.
- Raju K D, Compulsory v Voluntary Licensing: A legitimate way to enhance access to essential medicines in developing countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (1) (2017) 23–31.
- Jaipura L, Singh B & Nayak R, An introduction to intellectual property rights and their importance in Indian Context, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (1) (2017) 32–41.
- Sundaram S & Dubey S K, A Sequel to a Relatively Unusual and Complex Patent Situation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (1) (2017) 42–45.
- Kumari V V, Sastry R K, Chandran M A S & Srivastava T K, Managing intellectual property in collaborative way to meet the agricultural challenges in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (2) (2017) 55–64.
- Ryu C H & Suh M, Strategies used by patentees to delay patent disclosure in literature searches and measures for counteracting them, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (2) (2017) 65–75.
- Raina A, The T(i)PP(ing) point for pharma: Why having TRIPS+ patenting standards in the TPP is bad news for developing countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (2) (2017) 76–82.
- Issar N and Goel A, A critique of the Indian Patent Assignments Regime: Pre-invention assignments and employee‘s inventions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (2) (2017) 83–89.
- Act 39 of 1970.
- 2015 (2) Bom CR 100.
- 131 S. Ct. 2188 (2011).
- Rahman M, The protection of agricultural products under geographical indication: An alternative tool for agricultural development in Indonesia, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (2) (2017) 90–103.
- Lenin B K & Babu A, Comparative advertising and the consumer - Changing dynamics, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (3) (2017) 113–120.
- Tyagi A & Chopra S, Standard Essential Patents (SEP‘s) – Issues & challenges in developing economies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (3) (2017) 121–135.
- Banerji A & Suri F K, Patents, R&D expenditure, regulatory filings and exports in Indian pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (3) (2017) 136–145.
- Massadeh F & Al-Nusair F, Consumer protection in the UAE: The Trademarks Act in light of TRIPS provisions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (3) (2017) 146–153.
- Bhardwaj S, Padmanabham G, Jain K, Rao D S & Joshi S V, Technology commercialization in advanced materials sector: Indian context, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (3)(2017) 154–167.
- Sapatnekar A M &Nemane V V, Legal dynamics of intellectual property relating to nuclear innovations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (4) (2017) 177–187.
- Joshi O, Roy A & Janodia M, Unitary Patent Protection, Unified Patent Court, Supplementary Protection Certificate and Brexit, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (4) (2017) 188–199.
- Raizada G & Dhillon S D, Impact of intellectual property rights on international trade: Evidence from India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (4) (2017) 200–210.
- Krishna V, Jain S K &Chugh A, Commercialization and renewal aspects of patent management in Indian pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (4) (2017) 211–223.
- Nagpal M, Copyright protection through Digital Rights Management in India: A non-essential imposition, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (4) (2017) 224–237.
- Kumar A, IP protection to software: Conflict between Indian provision and practice, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 247–256.
- Arora S & Chaturvedi R, Impact of TRIPS on Providing Easy Access to Affordable Medicines in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 257–265.
- Muralidharan V N, Educational institutions and Copyright Laws, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 266–269.
- The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford and Orsv Rameshwari Photocopy Services and Anr, (2016) 73 taxmann.com 214 (Delhi). Judgment dated 16 September 2016. The citation of the judgment has been taken from the article: Muralidharan V N, Educational institutions and Copyright Laws, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 266–269, 269 (Reference No. 2).
- Article has referred: RBI v Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd., (1987) 1 SCC 424; International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) v Aditya Pandey, Civil Appeal Nos. 9412–9413 of 2016; and Entertainment Networks (India) Ltd v Super Cassette Industries Ltd., (2008) 13 SCC 30. The citations of these judgments have been taken from the article.
- Asok A, Compulsory licensing of patented drugs under national emergency, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 270–275.
- Triyanto, Copyright Law Enforcement: An Indonesia case study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 276–284.
- Mittal S, Effects of TRIPS plus provisions in international trade agreements upon Access to medicines in developing countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (6) (2017) 295–302.
- Saraswat J & Chaturvedi R, Copyright protection in the digital environment: Indian perspective and international obligations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (6) (2017) 303–310.
- Gandhi V H, International legal obligation of the state with reference to intellectual property rights (Patents) vis-à- vis right to health: The Indian case study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (6) (2017) 311–319.
- Massadeh F & Alkrisheh M, The fair trial procedure for intellectual property in light of TRIPS provisions: An analytical study of Jordan and the UK, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (6) (2017) 320–328.
- Sahu S &Panja S, Current status and challenges of medical device innovations- Indian perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (6) (2017) 329–335.
- Bouwer K, Insights for Climate technology transfer from international Environmental and Human Rights Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 7–21.
- Rosencranz A, Modi P, Parab S & Vora A, Climate change and the patent regime: Are patents the answer?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 22–26.
- Sankar U, Bandopadhyaya T K & Mehta C, Climate change and technology transfer: Tying the knot through human rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 27–34.
- Padmavati M, Ensuring longevity of traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity to address climate change, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 35–43.
- Bandopadhyay K, Patenting in renewable energy sector- An analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 44–50.
- Basu A, Grasping climate technology transfer: A brief discussion on Indian practice, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 51–59.
- Klien J A, Rao P M & Dalvi M, Competition and consumer privacy in the cyberspace market, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 70–85.
- Lisitsa V N, Intellectual property and intellectual rights: Issues of correlation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 86–93.
- Khanna N, The securitization of IP assets: Issues and opportunities, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3)(2018) 94–100.
- Verma S & Mishra N, Recognition and marketing opportunities of a ―GI‖ tag in handloom product: A study of Banaras Brocades and Sarees, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 101–110.
- Vaidya M, Garg S, Singh C & Mahajan M M, Changing dimensions of drug patents of Indian pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 111–118.
- Sharma G & Kumar H, Exploring the possibilities of Utility Models patent regime for grassroots innovations in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 119–130.
- Samuel M P, Sastry R K & Pavani S, A strategic framework for technology valuation in agriculture and allied sectors in India – Case study of chitosan, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 131–140.
- Egwu C H N &Egwu C, Genetically modified crops controversy: The actualization of intellectual property rights regime, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 151–158.
- Kishore K, Geographical indications in horticulture: An Indian perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 159–166.
- Act 48 of 1999.
- Roy A, Kardile M &Janodia M, Comparative analysis of Canadian ‗Certificate of Supplementary Protection‘ with USA and Australian ‗Patent Term Extension‘ and European ‗Supplementary Protection Certificate‘, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 167–173.
- Palar M R A, Sukarsa D E & Ramli A M, Indonesian system of geographical indications to protect genetic resources, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 174–193.
- Vats N K, Electronic library of spiritual heritage: Copyright limitations and exceptions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 194–197.
- Campi M, The co-evolution of science and law in plant breeding: Incentives to innovate and access to biological resources, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 198–210.
- Male G, Enabling environment for research and development growth in Africa: IP protection, challenges, drivers and approaches, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 211–221.
- Joshi O, Roy A &Janodia M, Analysis of SPC regulation associated with pharmaceutical products in Europe, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6) (2018) 233–242.
- Shaikh S A, Khode A & Deshpande N, Prior art searches in software patents – Issues faced, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6) (2018) 243–249.
- Verma S, Kumar R & Yadav S K, An empirical study on consumers‘ buying intentions of counterfeit products in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6) (2018) 250–260.
- Begum I & Sharma H K, Piracy: A threat to academicians and publishers, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6)(2018) 261–269.
- Aher S B, Lakaria B L & Yadav B S, Limitations of existing IPR legislations in managing emerging environmental issues, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6) (2018) 270–272.
- Srivastava S & Chetan, Continental impact and assorted empirical study of intellectual property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6) (2018) 273–276.
- Joshi O, Roy A &Janodia M, SPC regulation, analysis of SPC case laws and roadmap for pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (1–2) (2019) 5–20.
- Sarkar A, Reddy N & Sethi N, The menace of patent trolls: What the world can learn from India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (1–2) (2019) 21–27.
- Bagal Y, Contributory copyright infringement in music industry: Technological implications, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (1–2) (2019) 28–34.
- The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 1998 (112 Stat. 2860, Public Law 105–304).
- The Information and Technology Act, 2000 (Act 21 of 2000).
- Agarwal V, IPR registration in fashion industry of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (1–2) (2019) 35–40.
- Singh B P & Tripathi A K, Blockchain technology and intellectual property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (1–2) (2019) 41–44.
- Chakrabarti G, Biological Diversity Act: A concern for conservation of genetic resource and associated traditional knowledge in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 53–61.
- Adekola T A, Abolition of graphical representation in EU Trademark Directive: Should countries with similar provisions follow EU‘s footsteps?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 62–68.
- Singh A & Gupta P D, Pharmaceutical test data protection and demands for data-exclusivity: Issues and concerns of developing countries and India‘s position, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 69–88.
- Kariuki F, Notion of ‗Ownership‘ in IP: Protection of traditional ecological knowledge vis-a-vis protection of TK and Cultural Expressions Act, 2016 of Kenya, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 89–102.
- Tafreshi Say-yed H, Anti Pharmaceutical Patent Ever-greening Law: Global need in support of public health, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 103–112.
- Suluk C &Artemel M N, The Turkish Supreme Court of Appeals on non-use of trademarks, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 113–114.
- Asok A, Compulsory licensing for public health and USA‘s Special 301 pressure: An Indian experience, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (5–6) (2019) 125–131.
- Krishna A, Is Traditional Knowledge Digital Library a success?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (5–6) (2019) 132–139.
- Rajeswari R K, Durga Sri C H & Gupta R M V, Regulatory challenges in clinical trials: Strategies to overcome commonly observed deficiencies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (5–6) (2019) 140–148.
- Singh D & Singh R K, Licensing of Standard Essential Patents on FRAND Terms in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (5–6) (2019) 149–159.
- Paserangi H, Sakharinalin K, Heryani W, Famauri A T &Ratnawato K, PulutMandoti: Potential GI of Enrekang Regency in Indonesia, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (5–6) (2019) 160–166.
- Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Third Decade of Twenty-First Century (2020–2023) - VI
Abstract Views :30 |
PDF Views:30
Authors
Aqa Raza
1,
Kanika Malik
2
Affiliations
1 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat - 131 001, Haryana, IN
2 CSIR–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi - 110 012, IN
1 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat - 131 001, Haryana, IN
2 CSIR–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi - 110 012, IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 28, No 6 (2023), Pagination: 569-593Abstract
This Paper seeks to review the articles published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (hereinafter, JIPR) in the third decade of the twenty-first century from Volume 25 (1) (2020) to Volume 28 (5) (2023). In this decade, five new series on different themes of intellectual property rights (hereinafter, IPRs) were started by JIPR which include ‗IP & Taxation Policy‘, ‗Theoretical Underpinnings of IP Laws‘, ‗Standard Essential Patents‘, ‗IP Laws Declared by the Supreme Court‘, and ‗JIPR in IPR Research‘. In this decade, a total of 139 articles were published covering different areas of IPRs. The articles published in this decade constitute 14.52 (point five two) percent of the total articles published in JIPR till Volume 28 (5) (2023). In terms of percentage of the articles published in each decade, this decade with 14.52 (point five two) percent comes fourth after the decades 2010–2014 with 26.22 percent, 2005–2009 with 22.98 percent, and 2015–2019 with 15.04 percent. This is the sixth paper on the theme ‗JIPR in IPR Research‘ and proceeds with the same argument and method as developed and adopted in the First Paper1 and the sequel papers published under the theme.Keywords
JIPR, IP Statutes, Scholars, CSIR-NIScPR, CSIR-NISCAIR, IP Awareness, Articles, Copyright, Patents, Trade Marks, Geographical Indications, Trade Secrets, Industrial Design, Design, Plant Varieties, TRIPS, WIPO, Intellectual Property Rights, IPR ResReferences
- Malik K & Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A view through the articles published in the last decade of twentiethcentury (1996–1999) — I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 68–78.
- Malik K & Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A view through the articles published in the first decade of twenty-first century (2000–2004) — II, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 171–186.
- Raza A & Malik K, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A view through the articles published in the first decade of twenty-first century (2005–2009) — III, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 242–266.
- Raza A & Malik K, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A view through the articles published in the second decade of twenty-first century (2010–2014) — IV, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 347–376.
- Raza A & Malik K, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A view through the articles published in the second decade of twenty-first century (2015–2019) — V, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 462–481.
- Raza A, Theoretical underpinnings of Copyright and Design Laws: Decisions of the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (4) (2021) 220–234.
- Mathur A, A reflection upon the digital Copyright Laws in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (1–2) (2020) 5–14.
- Nirala C, Role of IP in Investor-state conflicts involving human rights issues, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (1–2) (2020) 15–22.
- Selvamani L V, Dhilipan C and Arul P G, Role of international universities in generating green technologies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (1–2) (2020) 23–28.
- Kumar A, ‗Unpackaging‘ trademark through tobacco regulations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (1–2) (2020) 29–39.
- Rahmah M, Barizah N & Blay S, Ensuring disclosure of origin of genetic resources in patent applications: Indonesia‘s efforts to combat biopiracy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (1–2) (2020) 40–56.
- Sohrabji N and Maloney K, Section 3(d) and pharmaceutical patents in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (3–4) (2020) 65–73.
- The Patents Act, 1970 (Act 39 of 1970).
- Novartis AG v Union of India, (2013) 6 SCC 1.
- Bashir A, Protection of geographical indication products from different states of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (3–4) (2020) 74–79.
- Laskowska-Litak E, Old town road of copyright‘s subject matter and aesthetics, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (3–4) (2020) 80–91.
- Mahfud M & Rani F A, The idea-expression dichotomy in artistic works: The case study in the United Kingdom, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (3–4) (2020) 92–99.
- Aseri A, Juxtaposing right to be forgotten and Copyright Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (3–4) (2020) 100–104.
- Sreelakshmidivya P, Kumar S R & Rao V U M, Review on WIPO trademark registrations on goods of class 5, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (3–4) (2020) 105–112.
- Singh K &Ourushotham M, Worldwide patent landscaping of AYUSH technologies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (5) (2020) 121–130.
- For AYUSH, see: Ministry of Ayush, Government of India; https://main.ayush.gov.in/about-the-ministry/ (accessed on 14 August 2023).
- Rani S, Singh S & Bhattacharya S, Impact of India‘s plant variety Protection Act: Analytical examination based on registrations under the Act, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (5) (2020) 131–139.
- Patra S P & Raju K D, Standards in automotive sector: Impact of patents on its development, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (5) (2020) 140–145.
- Gogoi J, Proprietorship of GI in India with special focus on the state of Assam, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (5) (2020) 146–154.
- The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 [Act 48 of 1999].
- Srivastava C & Rana M, Easily accessible treasure susceptible to misappropriation: A discourse on traditional knowledge, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (5) (2020) 155–161.
- Arora D, Celebrity endorsements – The interplay between Intellectual Property Law and the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (6) (2020) 173–179.
- Vishnu S, Software interoperability and Competition Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (6) (2020) 180–185.
- Madhumitha D S, A robot in IP – The issues and need for legislation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (6) (2020) 186–195.
- Kokane S, What cannot be patented in the jurisdiction of India?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (6) (2020) 196–203.
- Khobragade J W, Interface between Human Rights and Intellectual Property Rights with special reference to patent regime and right to health in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 25 (6) (2020) 204–214.
- Agrawal A, Interpreting ―Performers Rights‖ in the Indian Copyright Act to appropriately provide for singers rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (1) (2021) 5–13.
- The Copyright Act, 1957 (Act 14 of 1957).
- Gandhi V, Intellectual property disputes and resolutions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (1) (2021) 14–19.
- Bose C C&Akhila V P, Legal and administerial overreach by IPO while considering proof of right requirement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (1) (2021) 20–30.
- Garg M & Gupta S, Startups and the growing entrepreneurial ecosystem, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (1) (2021) 31–38.
- Banerjee R, Relevance of neighbouring rights in India in the context of the 2019 European Union Directive, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (1) (2021) 39–47.
- Mishra A, Geographical indications – Challenges and opportunities in Post-Covid India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (2) (2021) 57–68.
- Singh P &Gargate G, Legal protection, consolidation and evaluation of IP in academic units, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (2) (2021) 69–82.
- A M Radhika & Raju R, Rice GIs of Kerala: Gap in desired and achieved outcomes, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (2) (2021) 83–91.
- Kapoor A, Valuation of patent,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (2) (2021) 92–95.
- Ahmed S, Fair Dealing in Indian Copyright Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (2) (2021) 96–102.
- Dua S K & Khan A, Indian trademark law enforcement, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (2) (2021) 103–107.
- Patra S P, Artificial Inventors: A Shift in traditional policy paradigm, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (3) (2021) 119–126.
- Swarup S K and Rastogi S, Fashion design and intellectual property rights: An Indian Perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (3) (2021) 127–135.
- The Designs Act, 2000 (Act 16 of 2000).
- Chopra R K, Issues and challenges in standard essential patents: Indian perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (3) (2021) 136–145.
- P A Sabareesh, Traditional medicinal knowledge system and Intellectual Property Rights: scientific validation of Tri-doshas in Ayurveda, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (3) (2021) 146–161.
- Patra S P & Singh P, Journey of trademarks from conventional to Un-conventional - A legal perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (3) (2021) 162–170.
- Nomani M Z M, Intellectual property dimensions of biodiversity resources: From evidence to action, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (3) (2021) 171–177.
- Manchikanti P & Dias M, Pandemic, patents and public health, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (4) (2021) 187–198.
- Bhardwaj M, Sandhu A &Ghumman N, Pandemic, patents and public health, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (4) (2021) 199–207.
- Singh K, Chowdhury A R &Hanumanthu P, Patenting trends in global healthcare start-ups, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (4) (2021) 208–212.
- Dhuru N, Genericide- A Quintessential outcome of ignoring passing off or infringement of geographical indications, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (4) (2021) 213–219.
- Raza A, Theoretical underpinnings of Copyright and Design Laws: Decisions of the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (4) (2021) 220–234.
- Priyanka U & Vimala V, Impact of National Handloom Development Programme (NHDP) – Adoration to GI tagged Kuthampully Sarees, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (4) (2021) 235–239.
- Sajlan D, Money Heist: The hypothetical moral rights of Salvador Dali, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (5) (2021) 249–258.
- Chowdhury A R & Hanumanthu P, Finding entrepreneurial opportunities in India‘s medical device sector through patent landscape analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (5) (2021) 259–268.
- Tiwari K & Bhattacharya N S, Judicial navigation of drug name regulation in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (5) (2021) 269–276.
- Department of Health, Notification No. F.28-10/45-H(1), New Delhi, 21 December 1945.
- Patra S P & Ghosh A, Relative Innovation Index: State of Patent Examination in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (5) (2021) 277–285.
- Chaudhary M, Agarwal B & Bhatia M, Socio-economic condition of small-scale producers in Varanasi: A case of Banaras brocade and saree, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (5) (2021) 286–294.
- Azam M, Using metacognition in Intellectual Property Law teaching, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (5) (2021) 295–300.
- Kumar P & Sharma A, Refused patent applications in India in the field of ―Traditional Knowledge Biotechnology‖, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (6) (2021) 311–322.
- Najafi H, Sadeghi M &Shahbazinia M, Indirect trademark infringement: Policy considerations under US and Iranian Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (6) (2021) 323–334.
- Bansal R & Jaiswal P, Intellectual property rights and legal research: Issues and challenges, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (6) (2021) 335–341.
- Lakshmi G D, Selvamani V L, C Dhilipan&Manchala V V, COVID-19 patenting activity in higher educational institutions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (6) (2021) 342–350.
- Ramli T S, Ramli A M, Premata R R&Ramadayanti E, Copyrighted content commercialization on OTT media in Indonesia, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (6) (2021) 351–356.
- Kakkar S, Tandon R & Tandon N, Immunity boosting health drink mixes: A patent based review, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 26 (6) (2021) 357–369.
- Khobragade J W & C J Anson, Fair use provisions under the Indian Copyright Act: Awareness among librarians of colleges and universities in Maharashtra, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (1) (2022) 7–15.
- Chamarty S & Panwar G, Legal position of naked licensing in trademarks: A comparative legal study between India and the US,Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (1) (2022) 16–24.
- Nowak-Gruca A, Could an artificial intelligence be a ghostwriter? Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (1) (2022) 25–37.
- Ahmed M M&Kamble V, Geographical indications in Maharashtra, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (1) (2022) 38–41.
- Choudhary L & Kumar A, Stem cell patenting: Moral and legal dilemma, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (1) (2022) 42–51.
- Gupta A, Traditional cultural expressions: Analysis of culinary custom, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (1) (2022) 52–60.
- V P Akhila& Bose C, Amendments at Indian national phase: In harmony with PCT standards?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (1) (2022) 61–67.
- Kumar A, ―My Words, My Copyright‖: Justifiability of performer owning ‗speech‘ or ‗address‘, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (2) (2022) 79–90.
- Afaq A &Chhaya R, Securitization of intellectual property: Legal recourse in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (2) (2022) 91–99.
- Mishra A &Fatesaria H, Basmati rice – The on-going domestic challenge, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (2) (2022) 100–106.
- Azam M, The TRIPS Agreement revisited ‒ Time to open-up climate technologies for least developed countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (2) (2022) 107–129.
- Sapatnekar A M, Realizing the reality of Article 61 of TRIPS, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (2) (2022) 130–140.
- Chowdhury A R, Vridhi M &Gargate G A, Emerging technology of blockchain for energy sector, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (2) (2022) 141–145.
- Saktivel M, Agrawal A & Singhal S, Taxation Policy: A much-needed push for intellectual property creation in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (2) (2022) 146–153.
- Dahiya S, Sharma C & Goyal Y, Removing the roadblocks in equitable gobal access to COVID-19 vaccine through IPR waiver, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (3) (2022) 163–170.
- Ghose A & Ali S M A, Protection of cuisine under Intellectual Property Law: A global perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (3) (2022) 171–180.
- Eldakak A, How can lower-Income countries access COVID-19 medicines without destroying the patent system? The national exhaustion solution, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (3) (2022) 181–189.
- Kamisetti R R, Regulatory control on medical devices - A case study on device recalls by USFDA, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (3) (2022) 190–201.
- Sebastian T, Locating trade secrets under Indian Laws: A sui generis mode of protection, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (3) (2022) 202–211.
- The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (Act 9 of 1872).
- M Lavanya, Soni P, Sharma R & Dubey A, Patent landscape of COVID-19 innovations: A comprehensive review, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (3) (2022) 212–226.
- Agrawal A, Singhal S &Saktivel M, Ownership and transfer of ‗Musical Work‘ and ‗Sound Recording‘ – A case for service tax, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (3) (2022) 227–235.
- Dakshinamoorthi M, Author and owner intersection in sound recordings in the Copyright Act of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (4) (2022) 245–250.
- AGI Music SdnBhdv Ilaiyaraja and Another 2019 SCC Online Mad 1960; Indian Record Manufacturing Company Ltd v AGI Music SdnBhd, Ilaiyaraja and another (2020) C.S.No. 296 of 2016 &O.A.No. 338 of 2010, decided on 13 February 2020, Madras High Court; and MrsSellapappaKeeranv S Vijayaraghavan and another (2021) CS No. 241 of 2004, Decided on 1 September 2021, Madras High Court.
- Yadav P & Sharma S P, Traditional knowledge – Going multidimensional, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (4) (2022) 251–257.
- Bhardwaj M & Sandhu A, Significance and factors hampering patents commercialization in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (4) (2022) 258–265.
- Sharma S, Originality for copyright protection in literary works: After EBC v DB Modak, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (4) (2022) 266–276.
- Gargate G A, Chowdhury A R & Jain K, IP Policy Framework- A tool for IP policy development, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (4) (2022) 277–284.
- Raza A, Theoretical underpinnings of Patent Law: Decisions of the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (4) (2022) 285–289.
- Singhal S, Agrawal A &Saktivel M, Commercializing copyright – A taxing event for the copyright owner?Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (4) (2022) 290–300.
- Siwal A & Prashant, Coverage-disclosure conundrum and future of species patents in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (5) (2022) 309–316.
- Ahmed A, Afaq A &Chhaya R, Revisiting the investment opportunities in intellectual property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (5) (2022) 317–324.
- Lukose L P, Additional protection for geographical indications in India: A working of Section 22 (2) of Indian GI Act, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (5) (2022) 325–332.
- P Rekha Menon &Vasanthakumari P, Implications of GI on Indian specialty coffee – A case study on ‗Monsooned Malabar Arabica Coffee‘, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (5) (2022) 333–338.
- Sen P &Gargate G, IP audit: A case study of IIT Delhi, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (5) (2022) 339–350.
- Raza A &Alam G, Theoretical underpinnings of Trademark Law: Decisions of the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (5) (2022) 351–366.
- Singhal S, Agrawal A &Saktivel M, Taxing the trade of the Trade Mark, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (5) (2022) 367–378.
- Permata R R, Ramli T S, Priowirjanto E S & Utama B, Identifying, preventing and overcoming trademark bullying in Indonesia, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (6) (2022) 389–396.
- The Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act 15 of 2005).
- Singh K, Impact of Patent (Amendment) Act, 2005 on Indian pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (6) (2022) 397–414.
- Sharma A, Bhardwaj A, Pruthi M & Sharma M, Intellectual property rights in context of New Education Policy 2020, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (6) (2022) 415–419.
- Choudhary L &Daga H, Patent Waiver on Covid Vaccine: Access for all or Global Supply Crisis?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (6) (2022) 420–426.
- Yadav P & Bohra S, Traditional knowledge: Penetrating intellectual property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (6) (2022) 427–433.
- Raza A &Alam G, Theoretical underpinnings of Copyright and Design Laws Post-KrishikaLulla and Godrej Sara Lee: Decisions of the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (6) (2022) 434–441.
- KrishikaLulla v ShyamVithal Rao Devkatta, 2015 (10) SCALE 718.
- Godrej Sara Lee Limited v Reckitt Benckiser Australia Pty Ltd, (2010) 2 SCC 535.
- Agrawal A, Singhal S &Saktivel M, Need for invention in the taxation regime of patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27 (6) (2022) 442–450.
- Pawar P S &Alarifi G, Rethinking the role of intellectual property rights in pharmaceutical industry of Saudi Arabia, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 7–14.
- Modi R, Vasmatkar A &Nandekar U P, Relationship between human rights and Copyright Law: Bibliometric analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 15–20.
- Chawla G & Buch N, Impact of online digital piracy on the Indian film industry: An empirical investigation into consumer behaviour, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 21–31.
- Yadava P C &Bhaduri S, Framing intellectual property rights in the Indian print media, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 32–41.
- Ministry of Commerce and Industry Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Government of India, National Intellectual Property Rights Policy, 2016 (12 May 2016); https://dpiit.gov.in/sites/default/files/national-IPR-Policy2016-14October2020.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2023).
- Siwal A & Prashant, From ‗Anti Suit Injunction‘ to ‗Anti Anti Suit Injunction‘, where would this journey end? Part - I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 42–45.
- Raza A &Alam G, Patent Law declared by the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 46–67.
- Malik K & Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through the articles published in the last decade of twentieth-century (1996–1999) — I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1) (2023) 68–78.
- Vishnu S, Pervasive effect of Competition Law on copyright societies in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 87–93.
- Pragya A, Private ordering in Copyright Law: The impact on fair use activities on the internet, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 94–106.
- Salar N, The Canadian UGC exception: An attempt to revolutionise fair use defence for user generated content, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 107–113.
- Upputuri A H &Üner Z Ö, Patent disclosure requirement for AI-assisted inventions: A comparative study of EU and India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 114–122.
- Raghavender G R & Singh G, Can Artificial Intelligence (AI) machine be granted inventorship in India?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 123–131.
- Thendralarasu S, A shift from state‘s exclusivity to respecting party autonomy: Conceptualising IP arbitration in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 132–142.
- Siwal A & Prashant, From ‗Anti-Suit Injunction‘ to ‗Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction‘, where would this journey end? Part - II, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 143–150.
- Raza A, Alam G & Talib M A, Copyright Law declared by the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023) 151–170.
- Malik K & Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through the articles published in the first decade of twenty-first century (2000–2004) — II, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (2) (2023)171–185.
- Hema K, Protection of Artificial Intelligence autonomously generated works under the Copyright Act, 1957- An analytical study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 193–199.
- Sawlani C, Copyright, culture and contemporary debates: A Jurisprudential analysis of fair dealing in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 200–210.
- Chowdhury A R &Hanumanthu P, Analysing India‘s National Education Policy from the angle of research, IP, innovation, and entrepreneurship, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 211–215.
- Bansal S &Vajpeyi A, The death of criticism: Moral Rights v Fair Dealing in the Indian context, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 216–223.
- Yadav S K & Verma S, Whether Indian Patent Act TRIPS compliant for pharmaceutical business: A case-based approach, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 224–230.
- Siwal A & Prashant, An introduction to Standard Essential Patents Part – III, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 231–235.
- Raza A &Alam G, Design Law declared by the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 236–241.
- Raza A & Malik K, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through the articles published in the first decade of twenty-first century (2005–2009) — III, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (3) (2023) 242–266.
- Swarup S K & Rastogi S, Industrial designs and folklore: A comparative study in Indian perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 273–283.
- Nidhi A, The Crossroad between intellectual property and clinical trials: Balancing incentives for innovation with access to healthcare, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 284–292.
- Sahitya K V & Kumar K I P, A paradigm shift in Indian and International Patent Regime- Critical review on ex- and current scenario (Covid-19 impact), Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 293–303.
- Pangging G, Sharma M, Sharma C L Rai N &Gogoi J, Status of geographical indications in the northeast region of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 304–311.
- Tiwari P, Bhatacharya N S &Manchikanti P, A study on mhealth innovations through the lens of patent analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 312–322.
- Prashant, Siwal A & Ghosh J, The SEPs debate and surrounding issues: Part -IV, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 323–333.
- Raza A &Alam G, Trademark Law declared by the Supreme Court of India in twentieth-century, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 334–346.
- Raza A & Malik K, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through the articles published in the second decade of Twenty-first century (2010–2014) — IV, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (4) (2023) 347–376.
- Chaudhary G & Nidhi A, The Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain: A breakthrough collaboration in IP Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 383–391.
- Nandekar U P &Rautdesai R, Nanotechnology patent applications and Section 3(d) of Indian Patents Act, 1970: An empirical research, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 392–401.
- Tyagi P, Social media and copyright: An Indian perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 402–412.
- Mishra P, Thakur V S, Shandilya S, Singhal A K & Kishore Y, Emerging technologies and IPR: A cross-jurisdictional examination of AI and Patent Laws in India and the USA, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 413–421.
- Szatkowska E, Registration of works belonging to the public domain as trademarks, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 422–431.
- Sah N & J JEzhilanban, IPR and Indian fashion industry: Challenges and possibility, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 432–437.
- Tandon V V&Siwal A, SEP litigations & issues in determining the FRAND license, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 438–444.
- Raza A &Alam G, Trademark Law declared by the Supreme Court of India in twenty-first century (2000–2009) — I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 445–460.
- Raza A & Malik K, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through the articles published in the second decade of twenty-first century (2015–2019) — V, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (5) (2023) 461–48.
- NIScPR Online Periodicals Repository, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, https://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/45, (accessed on 19 September 2023); From 20 March 2023, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) has started a new manuscript submission and processing system: https://or.niscpr.res.in/ (accessed on 19 September 2023); andfor indexing and archiving the articles on the website of the journal: https://or.niscpr.res.in/index.php/JIPR/issue/archive, (accessed on 19 September 2023).